12z GFS looks to be all snow on soundings at RDU. Gets close at 18z so maybe could mix a few pingers in but predominantly would be snow and Kuchera snowfall maps should be pretty representative.Looks like the gfs is keeping Raleigh out of the zr for the most part. Problem is the short rangers are bringing some back in. Still a lot of sleet regardless.
However if you look at the soundings, it would be more sleet where the models are depicting ZRI'll admit that I was wondering what RDU was doing when they put such heavy emphasis on icing in their discussion when the models at that point were almost all showing a totally snow event. Now I am seeing the logic behind what they were doing. That 850 nose is rearing its ugly head again and if the latest models continue a NW trend freezing rain becomes an issue for the forecast area.
im currently sitting in an OK position in NE Durham, but yep if that NW trend continues over the next 36 hrs... i could be in danger zone tooI'll admit that I was wondering what RDU was doing when they put such heavy emphasis on icing in their discussion when the models at that point were almost all showing a totally snow event. Now I am seeing the logic behind what they were doing. That 850 nose is rearing its ugly head again and if the latest models continue a NW trend freezing rain becomes an issue for the forecast area.
Dont you have to ? If you are the "I want all snow" crowd youre needing the weak strung out 2-3" type event even for Raleigh... If you want something more arent you gonna have to Sacrifice some of it to a mixed bag? Not a disputing post im honestly asking. TY for any inputIMO, we're walking a really tight balance between regaining more QPF and having more sleet/ice to go too far north.
No doubt RGEM has a cold bias at the surface, but historically anyway, I recall the RGEM being pretty decent with mid-level warm noses such as in January 2017. I'm not saying it hasn't been cold-biased at mid-levels in other events, I just can't recall them - but I'm getting older lol. Do you have some more recent examples where you can recall it being cold biased in the mid levels?
yup. and then those of us in the durham/chapel hill/hillsborough area are like "ok, stay right where you are... a little further NW bump is fine, but lets not go crazy with it"Yeah, this is becoming a every man for himself fight now. Those of us west of 77 want to see that NW trend happen now. We are comfortably snow right now and just need the QPF. Those out east and in Raleigh are walking a tight tight tight rope between snow and sleet.
I’ll tell you what’s going to happen…we are going to get an inch of sleet and an inch of snow then another inch of sleetThis is shaping up to be a near impossible forecast for the Triangle area and points east-northeastward near the 64 corridor
time to pull out those ice skates!I’ll tell you what’s going to happen…we are going to get an inch of sleet and an inch of snow then another inch of sleet
I’ll tell you what’s going to happen…we are going to get an inch of sleet and an inch of snow then another inch of sleet
You do get the feeling this is going to have some foggy preciseness even at 12hrs-18hrs out.This is shaping up to be a near impossible forecast for the Triangle area and points east-northeastward near the 64 corridor
2.5 inches of snow would be a Winter Storm Warning for Iredell I believeCharlotte to Raleigh. I would go with winter storm warnings due to mixing ZR. Easier to message up to 0.25” Ice and 1-3” snow/sleet. Then can always go higher once it verifies on the ground/radar. For Iredell/Wilkes/Surry/Yadkin it’s more winter weather advisory due to snow being more predominant and little to no chance of warning ice.
Neither. It's time to start paying attention to shorter range guidanceAre we trusting the euro or gfs more?
i don't think it's copium- i think for "transfers" like this i trust the CAMs a little more. convection stretching the inert low level vorticity over the gulf stream is important for cyclogenesis and I've always felt the CAMs resolve this betterThe 12z GEFS mean is a little drier than 06z, but the probs of >1” around I-85 went up. Might be more amped members dropping off, who knows. Also may be more in the range of using the operational models at this point. Curious if the low resolution ensembles will miss some of the intensity of the developing coastal? Yes, copium, perhaps.