• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry Feb. 19-20

Looks like the gfs is keeping Raleigh out of the zr for the most part. Problem is the short rangers are bringing some back in. Still a lot of sleet regardless.
12z GFS looks to be all snow on soundings at RDU. Gets close at 18z so maybe could mix a few pingers in but predominantly would be snow and Kuchera snowfall maps should be pretty representative.

gfs_2025021712_054_KRDU.png
 
I'll admit that I was wondering what RDU was doing when they put such heavy emphasis on icing in their discussion when the models at that point were almost all showing a totally snow event. Now I am seeing the logic behind what they were doing. That 850 nose is rearing its ugly head again and if the latest models continue a NW trend freezing rain becomes an issue for the forecast area.
However if you look at the soundings, it would be more sleet where the models are depicting ZR
 
Brad P not far off from what I see with the ZR/Sleet. One diff I do have is I have a relative min for the NC foothills into south West Virginia of 1-2” and higher amounts west and east away from places like North Wilkesboro.
 
I'll admit that I was wondering what RDU was doing when they put such heavy emphasis on icing in their discussion when the models at that point were almost all showing a totally snow event. Now I am seeing the logic behind what they were doing. That 850 nose is rearing its ugly head again and if the latest models continue a NW trend freezing rain becomes an issue for the forecast area.
im currently sitting in an OK position in NE Durham, but yep if that NW trend continues over the next 36 hrs... i could be in danger zone too
 
IMO, we're walking a really tight balance between regaining more QPF and having more sleet/ice to go too far north.
Dont you have to ? If you are the "I want all snow" crowd youre needing the weak strung out 2-3" type event even for Raleigh... If you want something more arent you gonna have to Sacrifice some of it to a mixed bag? Not a disputing post im honestly asking. TY for any input
 
No doubt RGEM has a cold bias at the surface, but historically anyway, I recall the RGEM being pretty decent with mid-level warm noses such as in January 2017. I'm not saying it hasn't been cold-biased at mid-levels in other events, I just can't recall them - but I'm getting older lol. Do you have some more recent examples where you can recall it being cold biased in the mid levels?

Jan 2-3 2022 is one I can think of

IMG_4667.png

IMG_4668.jpeg
 
Yeah, this is becoming a every man for himself fight now. Those of us west of 77 want to see that NW trend happen now. We are comfortably snow right now and just need the QPF. Those out east and in Raleigh are walking a tight tight tight rope between snow and sleet.
 
The RGEM/nam3 difference is prolly just be as simple as our classic LP track/strength tradeoff. 3k is a bit deeper and NW so you get mid lvl WAA and everyone takes their sleet and complains. RGEM further offshore and a touch weaker and a nice event.

Also, what a weird CAD setup. The fact that this look is producing snow on the RGEM on Feb 20th is wild to me
1739808952160.png
 
Yeah, this is becoming a every man for himself fight now. Those of us west of 77 want to see that NW trend happen now. We are comfortably snow right now and just need the QPF. Those out east and in Raleigh are walking a tight tight tight rope between snow and sleet.
yup. and then those of us in the durham/chapel hill/hillsborough area are like "ok, stay right where you are... a little further NW bump is fine, but lets not go crazy with it"
 
I’ll tell you what’s going to happen…we are going to get an inch of sleet and an inch of snow then another inch of sleet

Your guess is probably as good as mine. This will be a very hard storm to message because sensible impacts could vary wildly, just across Wake County
 
If in ENC, the GRAF/EPS/EURO have had the snow line as far south as HWY 70. Going to want to see that and the low more more ENE than NE to keep warm nose at bay.

Going to need to see if 12Z EURO/EPS continues that or backs to match other guidance with it up near HWY 64.

This storm is extremely sensitive to the low track. Seems like a slight wobble north or south will make a huge difference.
This is more stressful than the Jan 21 event
 
this storm is following the script of this winter to a tee.
1. days 5-10 show big dogs, entire eastern seaboard is on watch
2. days 2-5 have a strong southern trend (can't remember another winter like this, almost feels systematic) with cold press/lowering heights ahead of storm trending stronger. there's a perfect goldilocks suite that makes everyone happy around day 4 before the scale flips and it's too suppressed. 60 hours away seems to be the nadir of both storm totals and board morale, unless you are in the southern fringe of the crosshairs, a place like, say, moyock nc
3. 48 hours away to initialization NW trend kicks in. i've thrown my hands up, it's inevitable. every storm manages to find some extra qpf under the couch cushions for northern fringes. either the southern wave is stronger, or the northern stream is more cooperative, or the south east ridge helps the total orientation... something always happens.

we are between phase 2 and phase 3. some models have stopped the bleeding, others are already kicking back more moisture northwest.

i think trying to predict "what the next model suite will do" is tenuous but it if follows like every other storm, this is the turning point. the northwest ticks start now. if you're currently on a p-type line, the safe bet is expecting the p-type you don't want. sorry. your team was up but they just missed a field goal and now mahomes has the ball again. he's about to get a roughing the passer.

edit- had to look up moyock. it actually looks fine, unfortunately. for some reason in my head i pictured it being like a route 264 kinda town between little washington and bath
 
The 12z GEFS mean is a little drier than 06z, but the probs of >1” around I-85 went up. Might be more amped members dropping off, who knows. Also may be more in the range of using the operational models at this point. Curious if the low resolution ensembles will miss some of the intensity of the developing coastal? Yes, copium, perhaps.
 
Charlotte to Raleigh. I would go with winter storm warnings due to mixing ZR. Easier to message up to 0.25” Ice and 1-3” snow/sleet. Then can always go higher once it verifies on the ground/radar. For Iredell/Wilkes/Surry/Yadkin it’s more winter weather advisory due to snow being more predominant and little to no chance of warning ice.
 
Charlotte to Raleigh. I would go with winter storm warnings due to mixing ZR. Easier to message up to 0.25” Ice and 1-3” snow/sleet. Then can always go higher once it verifies on the ground/radar. For Iredell/Wilkes/Surry/Yadkin it’s more winter weather advisory due to snow being more predominant and little to no chance of warning ice.
2.5 inches of snow would be a Winter Storm Warning for Iredell I believe
 
The 12z GEFS mean is a little drier than 06z, but the probs of >1” around I-85 went up. Might be more amped members dropping off, who knows. Also may be more in the range of using the operational models at this point. Curious if the low resolution ensembles will miss some of the intensity of the developing coastal? Yes, copium, perhaps.
i don't think it's copium- i think for "transfers" like this i trust the CAMs a little more. convection stretching the inert low level vorticity over the gulf stream is important for cyclogenesis and I've always felt the CAMs resolve this better
 
Back
Top