• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry Feb. 19-20

Yeah calm down guys good grief. My comment was somewhat in jest, however each 12z model thus far has come back W/NW a tick. And NW isn't always the slp track but precip shield and warm layer. It's tough because the NAM and the RGEM both at this range can be pretty good with thermals. Rgem was a dream, NAM gives pause and says more ice still on the table. Either way as I've stated, I highly doubt qpf will be an issue
 
Yeah calm down guys good grief. My comment was somewhat in jest, however each 12z model thus far has come back W/NW a tick. And NW isn't always the slp track but precip shield and warm layer. It's tough because the NAM and the RGEM both at this range can be pretty good with thermals. Rgem was a dream, NAM gives pause and says more ice still on the table. Either way as I've stated, I highly doubt qpf will be an issue
I'm just hoping these SR models are right on thermals and the LR ones are off for N GA's sake. The signs are there on a majority of them for the snow to come a bit more south with no real major warm nose, but just like the last system and many like this, QPF always is over what modeling is doing UNLESS you're on a fringe.
 
If I was to give a forecast right now I’d say 1-3 for the CLT area and NE, 3-6 for RDU and NE with higher totals up in NE NC
The board of directors have issued a Snowfall Forecast Contest 3.0 Watch for this evening as conditions are favorable for the creation of a new forecast thread. Monitoring…
 
FV3 was probably gonna be 8+ for the northern and western triangle. Another thing that interested me on the NAM was the RH stating decently up in the snow growth zone later in the NAM run as it looks like across those same areas, the DGZ could be as low as the 850 level as it pulls out which would keep snow showers going during the day.
 
IMO a lot of the CAMS and short range look warmer south of HWY 64. EURO/EPS/RGEM little cooler in the 264/64 Corridor

One model may show 9"in Pitt county and one shows plain rain.
What's crazy is I live literally like 5 minutes at most from 64 bypass and 15-20 at most from HWY 1 so when I hear HWY 64/1 mentioned in winter storm outlooks I'm like ok does it mean high total, in the middle total, am I dealing with warm nose or all cold, etc.

Sent from my SM-S156V using Tapatalk
 
Not too bad from the GFS!!
59f2cc6abcbb4d77471f1314499f5cf6.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I'll admit that I was wondering what RDU was doing when they put such heavy emphasis on icing in their discussion when the models at that point were almost all showing a totally snow event. Now I am seeing the logic behind what they were doing. That 850 nose is rearing its ugly head again and if the latest models continue a NW trend freezing rain becomes an issue for the forecast area.
 
12z GFS is pretty consistent with 06z, slight improvement, if anything. Warning criteria back to the Triad. I’ll take it. GFS seems like it wants to get the defo band going, but is really light with it. Wonder if its lower resolution is having trouble with that. 🌭
 
RGEM has a cold bias typically, keep that in mind going forward
No doubt RGEM has a cold bias at the surface, but historically anyway, I recall the RGEM being pretty decent with mid-level warm noses such as in January 2017. I'm not saying it hasn't been cold-biased at mid-levels in other events, I just can't recall them - but I'm getting older lol. Do you have some more recent examples where you can recall it being cold biased in the mid levels?
 
Back
Top