• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry Feb. 19-20

Nice to see the GFS join the party with the thermal profile for the upstate, but hold on to a decent amount of qpf. It's still got .2-.3 falling that would be all snow north of 85. Also nice that it all falls in a short window from 7am to Noon.

That's probably about a best case scenario at this point for us, and could lead to a solid 2-3 inch'ish paste job.
 
Undoubtedly a better run for C / E NC. May not be where we want it, but it's better than it's been. DC snow weenies in shambles, too.

EDIT: It is really dry, though. Hadn't looked at QPF until now.
 
Last edited:
RDPS pretty dog water save ENC/SEVAView attachment 169729
I know the RGEM is generally more revered compared to the NAM, but it's also a shorter range model that really isn't in its wheelhouse. But it does show the same general idea of a lot of the other modeling, although it's really skimpy out further west, like you said.
 
Undoubtedly a better run for C / E NC. May not be where we want it, but it's better than it's been. DC snow weenies in shambles, too.
oh nooooo, not the snow weenines in shambles who live in the area thats gotten some of the best snow of the entire Eastern section of the country this winter 🤭
 
Am I missing something. This shows nothing 😂

Sounds like the GRAF must go out further than that shows (only until 5 am Wednesday), since the other Tweet mentioned it going to 1 pm on Wednesday. But extrapolated forward, I think that one that goes until 5 am would be pretty darn good, too.

The GFS is a little scary in the QPF department. I think we may be kissing the 1-2" QPF bomb goodbye. But we'll take the greater snow chances. The more optimistic models still keeps the Triangle near 1" QPF, which is great if that holds.
 
Wouldn't take much change at H5 for the low to be temporarily captured by the cutoff crashing in through the OH Valley, it's certainly trended in a more favorable orientation to do it over the past 24hrs. I feel like we are kind of in that dead zone between the globals and cams, where guidance has a habit of either loosing systems, or diminishing the expected impacts to sensible weather. The EPS shows we are still far away from locking down a track and strength, which will determine what, where and what everyone cares about, how much. I see some 970s in there tucked close, 980s, lots of 990s. We have a ways to go, I wouldn't write this off just yet, quite the opposite.

sfcmslp-meanmem.us_ma-8.png

sfcmslp-meanmem.us_ma-7.png
 
Sounds like the GRAF must go out further than that shows (only until 5 am Wednesday), since the other Tweet mentioned it going to 1 pm on Wednesday. But extrapolated forward, I think that one that goes until 5 am would be pretty darn good, too.

The GFS is a little scary in the QPF department. I think we may be kissing the 1-2" QPF bomb goodbye. But we'll take the greater snow chances. The more optimistic models still keeps the Triangle near 1" QPF, which is great if that holds.
I'm not 100% what GRAF goes to, but I kind of assume they cut it off early, but idk for sure.
 
Wouldn't take much change at H5 for the low to be temporarily captured by the cutoff crashing in through the OH Valley, it's certainly trended in a more favorable orientation to do it over the past 24hrs. I feel like we are kind of in that dead zone between the globals and cams, where guidance has a habit of either loosing systems, or diminishing the expected impacts to sensible weather. The EPS shows we are still far away from locking down a track and strength, which will determine what, where and what everyone cares about, how much. I see some 970s in there tucked close, 980s, lots of 990s. We have a ways to go, I wouldn't write this off just yet, quite the opposite.

View attachment 169739

View attachment 169737
Competely agree on the “dead zone” sentiment. Uncanny valley of forecasting
 
With that last frame it looks like it’s about to be a massive overrunning event right up I-85

I’ll put those odds @ 2.5%
I think it's possible Snow could make it to the ground in Atlanta Wednesday morning. Their issue is they do have a rather thick boundary layer, but being pre-dawn and with a surface that's not torching that much, it's certainly possible under heavier rates.

I think it's almost a given Gainesville to Toccoa will quickly flip to snow if they don't start out as snow, (assuming the thermal profiles being depicted before precip starts are accurate).
 
The GFS has me at 36/30 at 7am Wedsneday morning at which point it starts ripping snow at a moderate rate for the next 3 hours. Yet my surface temp stays at 34 degrees for that.... no chance. I'm not even a little concerned about the boundary layer here at this point.
Get it here early and we may be able to overperform the way Atlanta did back in early January. Assuming everything doesn’t go to sh** in the next 48 hours
 
Probably gonna decrease qpf

Cold = Weaker / Warmer = Stronger …. Time to pick a side, we’re not getting both imo.

We’ve got more than enough cold… time to start bringing some back as sacrifice for liquid. I’m not even talking about my area, I’m talking anyone SW of VA Beach ar this point

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
GEFS showing bullseye right on the NC/VA border near the coast. quite a different look from its 18z deterministic
 
The GFS has me at 36/30 at 7am Wedsneday morning at which point it starts ripping snow at a moderate rate for the next 3 hours. Yet my surface temp stays at 34 degrees for that.... no chance. I'm not even a little concerned about the boundary layer here at this point.
Hey burrel. You think I could get some good accumulation in sw Rutherford county or you think I will get the dreaded dry slot. I think you will get a good front end thump for sure down your way. Thanks buddy.
 
Back
Top