Baby steps fro, we don't want this thing coming back too fast now....We need a more + tilted, more anchored western ridge that way this thing can dig in, but notable improvement View attachment 127665
The NBM isn't bad, but I think we could use some really large-scale height super ensemble height anomaly and circulation maps that go out to day 15 & cover the last few days of NWP runs as sort of an integrated super ensemble. That would take all the paid sites we use now to the next level and I think give everyone a much better understanding of what's actually happening in general + trends, etc.
If this were to really become something to watch, when would you say we should start seeing a legit storm on the models. Maybe end of week?We need a more + tilted, more anchored western ridge that way this thing can dig in, but notable improvement View attachment 127665
If it’s legit….If this were to really become something to watch, when would you say we should start seeing a legit storm on the models. Maybe end of week?
Trust those images only if you want to be disappointed. I don’t even know why they exist.
That's actually pretty close. I haven't looked at the vorticity charts yet, but if that southern section was just a little faster, we'd have a boom.Pretty big change on the Euro that's for sure
You're right. I'm quickly learning how useless ensembles are for storms. Means are skewed by large members mostly. Seeing what percentage of members show accumulating snow and ignoring the amounts seems to be best. But even then caution is advised. Just this past week 30+ out of 51 members had snow for GSP, CLT and RDU. Even Atlanta had decent amounts. We see how that worked out.Trust those images only if you want to be disappointed. I don’t even know why they exist.
Don't let the gif fool you, it's a 24 hr qpf and I'm looking at the increase along the coastal inland sectionsHopefully guys with better access will chime in soon but seems to be a tick increase in precip on the EPS, guess there might be a few members biting?
View attachment 127666
It’s not the ensemble part that is garbage, it’s that type of chart. It is the worse form of looking at the 6hr QPF/850mb temp chart and then assuming it’s snow.You're right. I'm quickly learning how useless ensembles are for storms. Means are skewed by large members mostly. Seeing what percentage of members show accumulating snow and ignoring the amounts seems to be best.