severestorm
Member
Reality check:
Lakes Low
Canada low diving to Gulf then up East Coast unlikely
Marginal temps
Don't get sucked into this one.
?Reality check:
Lakes Low
Canada low diving to Gulf then up East Coast unlikely
Marginal temps
Don't get sucked into this one.
It’s one run 200 hours out. Why are you acting like this is the gospel. The only thing that should be taken from this run is a better ridge and faster moving vortex
Okay, I'll revisit this post next week then. #remindme*sigh*
The lakes low myth just won’t die.
Whoever told y'all you can't have a GL low to get cold and snow in the south, I just want to tell them they should sell cars because that myth constantly gets spread.Reality check:
Lakes Low
Canada low diving to Gulf then up East Coast unlikely
Marginal temps
Don't get sucked into this one.
So now we can't get a storm that's 7 days out after it has literally trended to a much better potential in about 3 runs? Okay I guess lol
It’s 1 ------- GFS run that showed a cutoff stalling and you’re taking it face value. That’s just as bad as seeing a snowstorm and taking it face value. There’s more options on the table but the general longwave pattern has trended better overnight and today. Focus on that insteadOkay, I'll revisit this post next week then. #remindme
Not only that but the Southeast LIVES on marginal temp events. LIVES!Whoever told y'all you can't have a GL low to get cold and snow in the south, I just want to tell them they should sell cars because that myth constantly gets spread.
Most snow in the south comes from a pattern relaxing. I won't worry about temps right now. He'll GFS is struggling if it want to go pass east of the Apps. ???Not only that but the Southeast LIVES on marginal temp events. LIVES!
I would tend to believe that if there is a storm in this time frame, the dynamics would have 850s end up colder… we’ll see… there will have to be a storm firstEven if we warm up out in front of this storm in the mid-levels... looks like the arctic airmass is locked in place at the surface.. could get an ice storm. (at least according to this run.)View attachment 127627View attachment 127628View attachment 127629
We really need someone to come up w/ some nice (time lagged) super ensemble products for us, because it's not easy to see the forest through the trees sometimes using operational models or even ensemble suites which can vary quite considerably from run to run. Would love to see what a probability matched mean (correcting for increasing dispersion w/ range) & probability product of the last 3-4 0z & 12z runs of the GEPS, GEFS, & EPS would look like for say z500a, SLPa, precip, 850Ta, VP200a, & 48-72 hr snowfall.
Isn't the best to that we have is the NBM though?
I bet kuchera shows at least .8 ?National Blend of Models...note that it is only 10:1, not Kuchera, so these amounts are really low compared to what the models say under Kuckera.