I had a gut feeling 00z guidance would be bad, still not worried
144 hr moisture has to be snow in SC.
GFS has been bouncing around run to run with 50/50 low. This run it lifts a little quicker and is weaker.
View attachment 8354
Lol the Trailing energy and possible light backside snow is still 6 days away . Tennessee extreme northern bama and Georgia people have plenty of time for it to trend better . Of course the flip side is it could also go the other way
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Looking a the Surface Maps of the GFS on TT compared to the 2M Dewpoint Maps it appears to me the winter precip takes on similar oreintation to the upper 20’s dewpoint locations. If that’s the case I like what the NAM is showing at this range.I know this is long range nam when I am showing hour 84. But you can’t help too noticed that the dew points are 10-15 difference between the nam and gfs. This just backs up what I was saying just a few degrees can make a big difference.
GFS dew points 84 hours
View attachment 8352
NAM dew points 84 hours
View attachment 8353
850s are good but the 2m is blazing...ugh. Maybe it can cool down in the future because there is still a way to go.
and lol, I don't think I'd call this backside stuff. This energy looks separate. I mean it even pops a separate coastal.
Lotta rain for the 540 line to be 200 miles to my south!Better back energy with CMC
Trying to my friend, trying to.Take it easy guys, it's one run, not even a trend yet lol
well atleast the CMC was much better and got rid of its miller B scenario...Take it easy guys, it's one run, not even a trend yet lol
What, the GFS? Never....I feel like it erodes the CAD way to quick