RVD
Meteorology Student
Another thing to consider while watching model trends is the genesis of the 850mb low. Here's a comparison of the 18z GFS and NAM at 84:
They're similar on timing/location, but the NAM has a weaker low with larger ridging above it. This is what we want to see for more widespread snow, in addition to a stronger CAD. A weaker, suppressed 850mb low will prevent significant warm air advection. Further into the GFS run, the strength and relatively northward position of the 850mb low is what causes many to turn over to mixed precip or rain. Other than scouring out the CAD too quickly, of course. Granted, this is the long-range NAM but hopefully it delivers similar looks to this in future runs.
They're similar on timing/location, but the NAM has a weaker low with larger ridging above it. This is what we want to see for more widespread snow, in addition to a stronger CAD. A weaker, suppressed 850mb low will prevent significant warm air advection. Further into the GFS run, the strength and relatively northward position of the 850mb low is what causes many to turn over to mixed precip or rain. Other than scouring out the CAD too quickly, of course. Granted, this is the long-range NAM but hopefully it delivers similar looks to this in future runs.