EPS snowfall for Columbia SC?
I’ll play along. Can you do Anderson SC?Yeah that’s the best snow run from the EPS so far, very active ! View attachment 125618
That's such a subtle difference in the grand scheme, it makes my stomach hurtIcon looks much much better View attachment 125627
I feel we are starting to play with the theoretical limits on how good a pattern can be on some of these runs.Look at that cutoff block. Holy ---- that’s ------- incredible ----, the Arctic heigh field is on fire ! View attachment 125600View attachment 125599
This is that dreaded reference to the 'lakes low' we don't want to see folks.RAH vague at this point, which is understandable:
"Friday onward: Model solutions begin to diverge Fri and Sat. The
upper low will continue its slow east-northeastward migration over
the upper Great Lakes Fri and Sat, where it will either sit through
the weekend, or it will lift northward and get absorbed into a
southward sinking low over central Canada. Forecast uncertainty
increases through the weekend, thus confidence is low. Will keep the
weather largely dry through the weekend, however the 12Z GFS does
show some precipitation over the region Sun. Temperatures should
gradually decrease from near average to below average Fri to Sun."
Yeah, but look at that door openThat's such a subtle difference in the hras scheme, it makes my stomach hurt
I thought there were exceptions to that rule, whereas that low could be cut off and help funnel cold air southeastward.This is that dreaded reference to the 'lakes low' we don't want to see folks.
I'll leave it to the experts but thinking only if it reacts like the ICON 18z depicts. Typically a parked LP over the GL is not good for us.I thought there were exceptions to that rule, whereas that low could be cut off and help funnel cold air southeastward.
It also gives you an idea of how good the CAD could be when we end up with better snowpack in the northeast18z NAM temps for mid-afternoon on Wednesday. Again, no wintery precip but this is still winter weather folks.
View attachment 125628
Maybe not for y’all, but it’s great for us in the Deep South.I'll leave it to the experts but thinking only if it reacts like the ICON 18z depicts. Typically a parked LP over the GL is not good for us.
I remember a couple years back, this came up and Webb came in with some info that the Lakes low hasn’t really made a considerable difference in past set upsI'll leave it to the experts but thinking only if it reacts like the ICON 18z depicts. Typically a parked LP over the GL is not good for us.
Not even close! This is an actual system from the plains, the GLL is a different entity! Good try tho!This is that dreaded reference to the 'lakes low' we don't want to see folks.
@ArccSo are you saying us folks south of I-20 in the Deep South has a shot?Maybe not for y’all, but it’s great for us in the Deep South.
Obligatory “suppression at this stage of the game is good”?
I would think so. Especially being 7-8 days out.Obligatory “suppression at this stage of the game is good”?
Yeah this is good to see. There is a mixture out there right now with how the models and model ensembles are handling that. UKMet here drops the low out west (no good)More western driving this GFS run so far View attachment 125629
YesObligatory “suppression at this stage of the game is good”?
Absolutely. It will like always will depend on timing and wave location, but the chance is definitely there.@ArccSo are you saying us folks south of I-20 in the Deep South has a shot?
Sounds right. Origin makes sense as typically we've just seen them parked up there and not moving...guess coming from Canada originally and not from points west and southwestNot even close! This is an actual system from the plains, the GLL is a different entity! Good try tho!
The power of blocking50/50 low hanging on. Nowhere for that high pressure to goView attachment 125639