smast16
Member
Is it too much to ask for consistent runs on the GFS? I think it flips around worse than my wife's cravings when she was pregnant.
Does anyone else not find this forecast amazing? These are averages. Unless we just get hit with just a few brutal short lived cold spells to skew it downward this will be some start to winter
Yes, it is too much to ask. It's what the GFS (and other models to some extent) do/does when dealing with a pattern change. Fickle yes.Is it too much to ask for consistent runs on the GFS? I think it flips around worse than my wife's cravings when she was pregnant.
You know how useful a deterministic 850MB 300 plus hour model map is?This is a very ugly map lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You know how useful a deterministic 850MB 300 plus hour model map is?
Why do u post this stuff look at the time stamp homie!This is a very ugly map lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why do u post this stuff look at the time stamp homie!
It's kind of hard to worry too much about the LR GFS this year. We honestly don't know what we've got there, in terms of usefulness. Word is, it's not very good out in time. I know that's not really news, but that was called out specifically wrt this new version. We've already seen its propensity for bouncing around.I truly thought I posted in whamby thread. You know if it showed record cold and snow it would be posted no Matter what the time stamp was lol
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's kind of hard to worry too much about the LR GFS this year. We honestly don't know what we've got there, in terms of usefulness. Word is, it's not very good out in time. I know that's not really news, but that was called out specifically wrt this new version. We've already seen its propensity for bouncing around.
Looking at the Euro op and its ensembles and the Canadian ensembles is probably the right way to go. If they continue to stiff arm the pattern change or undo it altogether, then it will be time to worry.
Can someone tell me over the past, let’s say 5-10 years, which model has been more consistent with patterns and winter storms? I’m just curious as to how often the euro caves to the gfs and vice versa.
The Euro used to be regarded as Dr. No, Killer of GFS dreams. Not so much anymore.Can someone tell me over the past, let’s say 5-10 years, which model has been more consistent with patterns and winter storms? I’m just curious as to how often the euro caves to the gfs and vice versa.
The Euro has had the best verification scores by a wide margin, but you’re right that it has probably had more misses the last couple years than what we’re accustomed to. One thing that I remember Grit saying last week is that the Euro has historically performed better in periods of high latitude blocking. I looked back at some of the periods in past years that had similar blocking to what we are seeing develop and the Euro did indeed do very well. A couple storms that I noticed it latched onto nearly 10 days out were 1/28-29/2010, 12/25-26/2010, and 2/12-13/2014.It feels like the last couple years the EURO has been performing horridly. But they are both really bad imo
How much is the area in the Atlantic throwing off the models?GEFS has no consistency. I think this again has to do with moving inside truncation as well, but this is terrible.
View attachment 124844
So basically we really have no clue lol could be warm could be cold.The Euro has had the best verification scores by a wide margin, but you’re right that it has probably had more misses the last couple years than what we’re accustomed to. One thing that I remember Grit saying last week is that the Euro has historically performed better in periods of high latitude blocking. I looked back at some of the periods in past years that had similar blocking to what we are seeing develop and the Euro did indeed do very well. A couple storms that I noticed it latched onto nearly 10 days out were 1/28-29/2010, 12/25-26/2010, and 2/12-13/2014.
That's a great question. It may be having a downstream effect, but I'm not sure it's the main problem - I think it's just the poor resolution of the GEFS beyond truncation. Look at how much more poorly resolved the SLP field is everywhere at 192 and beyond. It's the reason why we see these dramatic changes at this time interval so often.How much is the area in the Atlantic throwing off the models?