And yet we ended up with a crashing economy and panic anyway.Figuring out what was going to happen was never the problem. Figuring out the logistics of taking this virus head on without the resources in place, very little time to prepare and the monumental task of doing all of that without crashing our economy and creating a panic is an entirely different set of circumstances. Do you have any experience in that area? Its ok that you dont because those really smart people didnt either
definitely not an increase like case count, but just 2 days ago Georgia had 678 listed as hospitalized, tonight’s 7:00 numbers were 880 hospitalized. Granted only 202 increase and we dont know how many of those may be ICU. Another bad thing about a lot of Georgia rural areas is that there are locations without a hospital close.True, but you are not seeing any increase in hospital numbers either.
Naw, just mashed potatoes now6.5 earthquake in Idaho tonight. Loss of food?
definitely not an increase like case count, but just 2 days ago Georgia had 678 listed as hospitalized, tonight’s 7:00 numbers were 880 hospitalized. Granted only 202 increase and we dont know how many of those may be ICU. Another bad thing about a lot of Georgia rural areas is that there are locations without a hospital close.
Ok ill buy into that but victory comes in the second half of every fight. We will come out better and stronger as a country and positive changes will be made on all fronts. And we will agree to disagree on the leadership at the beginning because I am looking at this from an entirely different angle than you are.And yet we ended up with a crashing economy and panic anyway.
But we're talking about two different things. You're saying it wasn't possible to prepare for this, given the circumstances, and that nobody did or could have done it better. Maybe, maybe not.
But ending up with A) a crashing economy, a panicked public, and an unprepared healthcare system, while B) actively downplaying this at the beginning justifies the consideration of a connection between those two things. At the very least, it's not good overt leadership at the beginning. That part is not really debatable.
The CDC recommending all public wear masks is a hell of a correction to make after saying they don’t help unless you’re sick and trying to keep from infecting others.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hmm wonder where the public will get masks
Over/under 200k deaths by next Tuesday?
Over/under 200k deaths by next Tuesday?
You arent alone. Where were all these same arm chair qbs back in Jan? I can tell you, solely focused on impeaching the potus. Its really not worth discussing, espeacilly in this thread. Some folks view this crisis solely as a political opportunity. Is what it is.Ok ill buy into that but victory comes in the second half of every fight. We will come out better and stronger as a country and positive changes will be made on all fronts. And we will agree to disagree on the leadership at the beginning because I am looking at this from an entirely different angle than you are.
This is world wide correct ?You sure?
View attachment 38187
YesThis is world wide correct ?
Scarf, bandanas will work as well in public. Making 100,000 mask a day to keep med facilities stocked.Hmm wonder where the public will get masks
The article explains they will specifically say not to use N95 respirators or medical masks, as they should be reserved for HCP’s — but alternatives such as bandanas.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk