Thanks.... hope you didn't mind me using your life experience in my example.Great post! Thank you sir!
Thanks.... hope you didn't mind me using your life experience in my example.Great post! Thank you sir!
Fine by me what you said was 100% correctThanks.... hope you didn't mind me using your life experience in my example.
Did NY have 100% positives back in April?I think it changes . Something seems off to me.
View attachment 44232
Maybe I am misunderstanding the story but it reads to me like they are only reporting the positive results not the negative so the positive # is correct but the positive % is flawedI think it changes . Something seems off to me.
View attachment 44232
It’s hard to 100% at any place. Almost impossible I would think.Did NY have 100% positives back in April?
I think your right. 9.4% is better then 98%.Maybe I am misunderstanding the story but it reads to me like they are only reporting the positive results not the negative so the positive # is correct but the positive % is flawed
I think so too. Just was curious.It’s hard to 100% at any place. Almost impossible I would think.
You can add New York back on the list down the line, especially if herd immunity is not achievable.I was just perusing Worldometers and noticed Israel, after seemingly having eliminated community transmission during May, is now shooting up again with exponential growth being observed in new cases. They were one of the “success stories” lauded, as well, so it’s definitely a cautionary tale for countries that appear to have things under control.
No linkAnother good read if you got time today.
CDC Director: U.S. ‘Could Drive This Epidemic’ Into The Ground In 4-6 Weeks With Simple Steps
By Daily Wire News
Jul 14th, 2020 DailyWire.com
At least your state has a plan. Alabama has a half hearted plan. I've been listening to the state board meeting while putting up corn and it's a joke. Nothing is mandated and it's all guidelines ? But the state superintendent was like we don't really have a concrete plan but we got you 600 gallons of hand sanitizer (for the entire state!) and your school nurses will get an extra $600 (per district!) for cleaning supplies. What a joke!! My local district has not said one peep either and school is supposed to start August 10thShocker, NC Governor lays out plan that is basically hybrid, with mix of face to face and virtual learning. All teachers, staff, students required to wear face coverings....man, teachers, whose job all day long is speaking to students to do so while wearing a mask. If I was a student and my test grades were less than stellar, first thing I'd tell my parents.... "I can't understand the teacher from behind that mask"
In all seriousness, my wife's school District is laying out a plan that has all k-8 attending school at all campuses to have enough space to properly social distance students in class, then all 9-12 will be remote/virtual. Trust me, there is no plan that everyone will like and agree on.
So in other words it will be like the flu in that case? You can get it over and over again?Can someone help me understand what happens if antibodies diminish fairly rapidly, like a few studies I have seen have indicated?
My thought is if the above is the case, then a vaccine won't be effective and also getting the virus and getting over it won't be effective.
Anyone considering that possibility? Or am I not thinking about it the right way?
Can someone help me understand what happens if antibodies diminish fairly rapidly, like a few studies I have seen have indicated?
My thought is if the above is the case, then a vaccine won't be effective and also getting the virus and getting over it won't be effective.
Anyone considering that possibility? Or am I not thinking about it the right way?
Can someone help me understand what happens if antibodies diminish fairly rapidly, like a few studies I have seen have indicated?
My thought is if the above is the case, then a vaccine won't be effective and also getting the virus and getting over it won't be effective.
Anyone considering that possibility? Or am I not thinking about it the right way?
Yeah, that sounds right to me. But with the flu, you tend to get sick for a few days and get over it. For Covid, you can get it and get over it quickly or get it and have symptoms for weeks or months or permanently, from all the different stuff I've read. And it would stand to reason that if you get it and then get it a second time, your risk of a serious complication or permanent injury would go up, particularly if you had a hard time with it the first time.So in other words it will be like the flu in that case? You can get it over and over again?
Shocker, NC Governor lays out plan that is basically hybrid, with mix of face to face and virtual learning. All teachers, staff, students required to wear face coverings....man, teachers, whose job all day long is speaking to students to do so while wearing a mask. If I was a student and my test grades were less than stellar, first thing I'd tell my parents.... "I can't understand the teacher from behind that mask"![]()
In all seriousness, my wife's school District is laying out a plan that has all k-8 attending school at all campuses to have enough space to properly social distance students in class, then all 9-12 will be remote/virtual. Trust me, there is no plan that everyone will like and agree on.
Some notable news in the last 24 hours:
1. California is rolling back the reopening in some counties:
2. The Disney World in Hong Kong had to close down due to a spike in the cases in the last couple of days.
Can someone help me understand what happens if antibodies diminish fairly rapidly, like a few studies I have seen have indicated?
My thought is if the above is the case, then a vaccine won't be effective and also getting the virus and getting over it won't be effective.
Anyone considering that possibility? Or am I not thinking about it the right way?
Not sure why hospitals are being asked to bypass the CDC in reporting data to the federal government.
Great post, I think you hit the nail on the head.I'll get this party started with something for us to think about moving forward that might help in how we discuss this.
Shane (@SD ) mentioned somewhere about individuals having different perspectives about the virus and how it effects us (or something like that).
I think what sometimes gets in our way of having productive conversations about the virus is we struggle to view from another's perspective or life experience. For instance, SD is a cancer survivor (God bless you man) and therefore in a high risk category, he views this virus and how it's handled from that perspective, cautious and concerning perspective, and understandably so. My mom, who just turned 76 yesterday (God bless her too), grew up on a farm, hardest working woman I've ever seen, chopped the fields, pick veggies, worked in those Perdue chicken houses, survived broken bones, accidents and open heart surgery 2 years ago.... not to mention she has a deep christian faith. Those all drive her to say "you can't hide from sickness", living her life, no fear, no concern for what happens to her and that's an entirely different, and I also think, understandable perspective.
I've dealt with 7 co-workers that have tested positive, seriously disrupting our work force and operations, none got "sick", just mild symptoms and several completely asymptomatic, that shapes my perspective... Then you have those that have lost jobs due to the virus, that shapes their perspective, of course there are those that have lost loved ones due to the virus and that influences their's.
Not sure if I'm making my point, but our own life experiences tend to dictate how we approach this situation, it makes it difficult to deal with as there is no "one size fits all" solution to any of it. However, maybe just maybe if we tried to see from the other's point of view that most likely has been shaped by their own life experiences, then maybe we can have genuine productive conversation. Conversation that will not result in any additional thread lock outs.
No link. Going forward please link the stories or the posts will be deleted. Not trying to drive a hard bargain here but simply posting the title with nothing else isn't helpfulInteresting article.
German Study: Almost No Coronavirus Spread at Schools That Reopened
by Matt PalumboPosted: July 14, 2020
Fight tech tyranny. Join Dan on Parler @dbongino.
No link. Going forward please link the stories or the posts will be deleted. Not trying to drive a hard bargain here but simply posting the title with nothing else isn't helpful
DankeFor those that speak German
![]()
Corona-Studie an Schulen: Kinder eher Bremsklötze der Infektion
Sachsen hat als erstes Bundesland nach dem Lockdown wieder mit dem Schulunterricht begonnen. Eine Studie zeigt: Neue Corona-Hotspots sind dadurch nicht entstanden. Nach den Sommerferien soll auch die Maskenpflicht entfallen.www.faz.net
Danke
I swear to g-d these people start earlier every year lol.
I swear to g-d these people start earlier every year lol.