Snowlover34
Member
He posts on AmericanWxHey does anyone know what happen to @GaWx haven’t seen him post on here since last winter
Does anyone remember Phil from Gainesville ? I haven't heard from him in a long time. Hope he's ok !
Make Larry Great AgainHe posts on AmericanWx
I guess he likes talking to himself.He posts on AmericanWx
Old Navy = GAP kinda thangI was going to ask, is it just a preference thing to post on American vs here? I’m a world class lurker and I don’t even bother lurking over there. #southernwxloyal
I think it's more along the lines of people who just want to check for new posts every couple of days vs every couple minutes.I was going to ask, is it just a preference thing to post on American vs here? I’m a world class lurker and I don’t even bother lurking over there. #southernwxloyal
1900-1904 was a particularly bad period for snow in Tulsa. There was 0.0" in 1900-01 and 1903-04.The GFS having a snow hole all day here is just crazy. It runs for 16 days!!
I need to see if Tulsa has ever had a winter with zero snow before January 20th. I bet not
I think I am more likely to get snow this winter than UNC is to make the NCAA tournament this year.
1900-1904 was a particularly bad period for snow in Tulsa. There was 0.0" in 1900-01 and 1903-04.
Its interesting to see modeling trying to converge on a solution of leaving our potent wave out in the West, or even the Pacific now.
Imagine that. The Southeast always finds a way to no snow.
Climate change1900-1904 was a particularly bad period for snow in Tulsa. There was 0.0" in 1900-01 and 1903-04.
Climate change
Models are pathetic especially when it comes to winter weather in the SE. That's all I'm going to say about that. lolWheres those probability maps showing some of us at 80-90% for 1 inch plus accum over next 10 days? Heck i was at like 50-60% for 3 inches at one time lol.
Models are pathetic especially when it comes to winter weather in the SE. That's all I'm going to say about that. lol
I'm going to quit this crap of following weather one of these days... lolYeah all I've heard for 6 weeks now is how such a great pattern was coming and yet here we sit... Not one flake. Not even close either...
This is one of my issues with probability forecasting, which has gained a lot of traction in recent years. What does an 80-90% probability of 1" of snow mean? Any 80-90% chance of getting 1" snow, right?Wheres those probability maps showing some of us at 80-90% for 1 inch plus accum over next 10 days? Heck i was at like 50-60% for 3 inches at one time lol.
I'm going to quit this crap of following weather one of these days... lol
Yup. Had this sickness for far to longYeah good luck. It's like a sickness and there's no cure
I have actually wondered the last two years why I do it. It's not like following the models and all and seeing what they show a week to 10 days or more out is going to change things one way or the other. Why do we need to know so far in advance if it's going to snow or not?I'm going to quit this crap of following weather one of these days... lol
I have actually wondered the last two years why I do it. It's not like following the models and all and seeing what they show a week to 10 days or more out is going to change things one way or the other. Why do we need to know so far in advance if it's going to snow or not?
You nailed it. I have railed against probability forecasting my entire career. It's a crutch for mainly broadcast meteorologists to lean on as easy and visible justification for their forecasts. It's horse IMO. It's also very easy to use to misrepresent to fit a narrative - IYKYK.This is one of my issues with probability forecasting, which has gained a lot of traction in recent years. What does an 80-90% probability of 1" of snow mean? Any 80-90% chance of getting 1" snow, right?
Well, no, as it turns out. There is no scenario where an ensemble suite can actually give you an 80% probability of 1" of snow 7+ days out. I mean, it can show that, but in reality, you do not actually have an 80% chance of getting 1" of snow.
It's fun to look at all those images, but they don't mean anything at all...other than there is a period of interest that you should pay closer attention to.
Exactly. The "probabilities" change with every model run, sometimes substantially. That's not a probability. That is just another pretty model chart.You nailed it. I have railed against probability forecasting my entire career. It's a crutch for mainly broadcast meteorologists to lean on as easy and visible justification for their forecasts. It's horse IMO. It's also very easy to use to misrepresent to fit a narrative - IYKYK.
I don’t even like ensembles. Much less a probability map. If I had a nickel for every time I was lead on by one of those I’d have a pocket full of changeThis is one of my issues with probability forecasting, which has gained a lot of traction in recent years. What does an 80-90% probability of 1" of snow mean? Any 80-90% chance of getting 1" snow, right?
Well, no, as it turns out. There is no scenario where an ensemble suite can actually give you an 80% probability of 1" of snow 7+ days out. I mean, it can show that, but in reality, you do not actually have an 80% chance of getting 1" of snow.
It's fun to look at all those images, but they don't mean anything at all...other than there is a period of interest that you should pay closer attention to.
It's why I said what I said the other day about it being less stressful when you only had the MRF, which I think only went out to 7 days.Maybe one of these days We will learn if a Storm is showing up in a particular Timeframe, To not look at it again until it's with 5 days of Happening. Watching every run know good and well a run 10 days out is not verifying is pretty useless and really not even fun
Heard this one before. Its impossible to do that anymore. However, sometimes I wish it was like pre 1999 for me (when I found the interwebs of weather) and I had to watch TWC on the 8th to see what was upMaybe one of these days We will learn if a Storm is showing up in a particular Timeframe, To not look at it again until it's with 5 days of Happening. Watching every run know good and well a run 10 days out is not verifying is pretty useless and really not even fun
I don’t even like ensembles. Much less a probability map. If I had a nickel for every time I was lead on by one of those I’d have a pocket full of change
I used to just read the RAH forecast discussions and see if they were talking about snow. Then one year they were talking about a storm and I wondered if there were online forums where people talked about the weather. That's how I ended up at American and then here. Sometimes I think maybe it would be better to go back to just reading the forecast discussion and if they mention a possible storm then come here to check things out.Maybe one of these days We will learn if a Storm is showing up in a particular Timeframe, To not look at it again until it's with 5 days of Happening. Watching every run know good and well a run 10 days out is not verifying is pretty useless and really not even fun
I appreciate that I think. I grew up a cold blooded winter freak. As a kid I would buy weather books from Barnes and Noble just to skim through them in my bed at night. Had to have the farmers almanac every year to see when I was going to get snow. My weather knowledge is subpar compared to most of you guys but I generally know what I’m looking for. Most of what I’ve learned is from following these boards for the last 15-20 years. There’s a wealth of knowledge here for closet weather nerds. You just have to be willing to try at times.
You know, I remember a time we didn't get along so well . You've become one of my favorite posters. You literally just described my own creed on ensembles and probability maps. Kudos on your pattern discussions recently too, btw .
And nailed blzzard of 93 from 5 days out. I was in mtns for that one an twc, local mets saw it coming from the get go. Had to be all they had to use for a tool back then.It's why I said what I said the other day about it being less stressful when you only had the MRF, which I think only went out to 7 days.