Unfortunately, the next real chance of rain (aside from very isolated convection) for NC isn't until early/mid next week, depending on you model of choice.
Their track record has been pretty good. A possibility of storms doesn't mean that storms are a guarantee or even likely.Level 1 risk out for Friday as of now. The SPC hasn't had the best track record lately when it comes to severe threats here.
I am talking specifically for the Triangle area. I know it doesn't guarantee storms, but when you keep saying there is a rosk for severe storms and nothing happens, people are going to start thinking you're crying wolf.Their track record has been pretty good. A possibility of storms doesn't mean that storms are a guarantee or even likely.
Yeah. I know they see that conditions seem favorable, but for whatever reason nothing materializes. I will still listen, but with much less concern now until I see that line to my west on radar.I am talking specifically for the Triangle area. I know it doesn't guarantee storms, but when you keep saying there is a rosk for severe storms and nothing happens, people are going to start thinking you're crying wolf.
So what is your expectation here? They don't say anything? All general tstorm and MRGL risks are intended to do is raise awareness that a storm or 2 could be severe. It's not like spc is busting on high end outlooks locally.I am talking specifically for the Triangle area. I know it doesn't guarantee storms, but when you keep saying there is a rosk for severe storms and nothing happens, people are going to start thinking you're crying wolf.
What would you do if you were the SPC and 48 to 24 hours out, some models were showing some level of storm coverage across the area, and there were at least a few parameters that suggested that any storms that form could become severe? What would you do?I am talking specifically for the Triangle area. I know it doesn't guarantee storms, but when you keep saying there is a rosk for severe storms and nothing happens, people are going to start thinking you're crying wolf.
You would have to do what the SPC has for our area Friday and put the marginal risk out. This setup looks a bit like one we had here in 1992 when there were questions about coverage. The SPC went with a watch and for some of us it verified bigtime. Only 3 storms, but all of them were long tracked, damaging storms. One of them came through this area with golf ball size hail and hundreds of trees down. It is still the worst storm the Jonesville area has had in my lifetime.What would you do if you were the SPC and 48 to 24 hours out, some models were showing some level of storm coverage across the area, and there were at least a few parameters that suggested that any storms that form could become severe? What would you do?
But it sounds like if you ("you" being an organization that primarily outlines the risk of severe thunderstorms in the United States) outline a risk of any level for a region and somebody's house or their county or their general community doesn't receive a severe storm, then you are just crying wolf and nobody will trust you.You would have to do what the SPC has for our area Friday and put the marginal risk out. This setup looks a bit like one we had here in 1992 when there were questions about coverage. The SPC went with a watch and for some of us it verified bigtime. Only 3 storms, but all of them were long tracked, damaging storms. One of them came through this area with golf ball size hail and hundreds of trees down. It is still the worst storm the Jonesville area has had in my lifetime.
Oh yeah, they have a tough job for sure, one I don't think I could handle for many reasons. They catch it from both sides when things do not go right, or even if they do in marginal situations. Going back to 1992 that watch was needed, but for 90% of its coverage area nothing happened. For those of us that did get hit though, it was rough. The storm here had winds at least up to 60mph and closer to 80-90 in a small area just north of me. Another one dropped a tornado south of Greenwood SC that same day.But it sounds like if you ("you" being an organization that primarily outlines the risk of severe thunderstorms in the United States) outline a risk of any level for a region and somebody's house or their county or their general community doesn't receive a severe storm, then you are just crying wolf and nobody will trust you.
So what is your expectation here? They don't say anything? All general tstorm and MRGL risks are intended to do is raise awareness that a storm or 2 could be severe. It's not like spc is busting on high end outlooks locally.
Looking at Friday it's the same as the rest of the setups we've had. Decent setup but a list of question marks and possible detractors from severe weather. If we can clear up and destabilize behind the initial ofb and debris clouds we could get a few storms rolling off the mountains that drop golf ball hail and wind damage across multiple counties. If we stay too cloudy or subsident in the wake of the morning disturbance nothing happens. There's no good way to convey that publicly but it's the whole reason for mrgl. If they say nothing and we get a long track storm/supercell or 2 that affects multiple counties it'll be "NO ONE TOLD US!".
Nam 3k does have some clusters of storms over central NC tomorrow night....
Garbage model. If the HRRR is having a tough time you know the NAM will suck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk