Webberweather53
Meteorologist
Another important observation for Saturday, in addition to less synoptic scale forcing for ascent...
Another important observation for Saturday, in addition to less synoptic scale forcing for ascent...
NAM is a classic @Webberweather53 View attachment 40254
NAM shows More than enough CAPE View attachment 40255View attachment 40256
Also shows storms arriving at or just right after peak heating, soundings are supportive of some very large hail given the large amounts of cape coinciding with solid 0-6km bulk shear and elongated mid/upper level hodos, also solid soundings for damaging winds and even a few isolated tornadoes, SPC put that marginal out due to uncertainty but I wanna bet there’s going to be a upgrade if things hold View attachment 40257View attachment 40258View attachment 40259
???Yo Fro and WebbView attachment 40273
Yup hell of a boundaryI just realized looking at temps/SBcape the 3km nam sets up a backdoor front, hmmm
This is a classic Great Plains dry line big hail sounding minus the fact that environmental CAPE is <500 j/kg. If we can get more CAPE than forecast by the 12z NAM, we're going to be in big trouble
View attachment 40297
Well considering that how bad the NAM was with this system and how it did with Easter, CAPE was higher, I have a hard time trusting the NAM, at times. I'm guessing an increase in CAPE would cause a tornado concern?
NAM basically takes a decent amount of NC out the threat from that backdoor front, really didn’t wanna chase... those backed low level winds tho
Good maybe they weaken some since they still far enough away at 0z Sunday.
There may not be much in the way of surface based CAPE as you get closer to the VA border in the western piedmont
I’m really surprised extreme Ne Georgia and upstate sc isn’t in a slight risk. Seems like good agreement for a area of storms moving through possibly hail makers to.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk