Can you say triple point low
What’s this mean?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What’s this mean?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You know it could be weather models not handling the environment well. I clearly remember some future forecast radar on april 27th 2011 showing a big blob of rain going over the state but we all know that didn't happen. I may be wrong but im just putting my two cents in on this.I’m sure ARCC or someone else on here could give a better description than myself, but I believe it would limit the tornado threat if that sounding is correct, but I may be wrong.
I’m sure ARCC or someone else on here could give a better description than myself, but I believe it would limit the tornado threat if that sounding is correct, but I may be wrong.
That second wave isn’t going to be a QLCS... NAM is on crack making it linear
Doubt it. I also am not 100% sure the first line will just be junk!So that first line may make the second line weaken?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Doubt it. I also am not 100% sure the first line will just be junk!
That second wave isn’t going to be a QLCS... NAM is on crack making it linear
That’s the way I’m approaching it.So 2 possible rounds of severe weather with the second being worst than the first? Of course it can change
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It weird tho, bc that first area of “junk” isn’t that elevated, those storms could easily becomed surface based if they wanted to, maybe there very low topped so UH isn’t appearing impressive with them as say a storm that’s 30-40kft high ?
The second wave has a excellent shot at being linear. Linear forcing will be increasing quickly as the upper level winds begin to parallel the front.