CNCsnwfan1210
Member
The main Baja SW is further ahead the kicker on the NAM. Likely means more WAA introduced quicker into the SE
Hope this doesn’t mean more ice
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The main Baja SW is further ahead the kicker on the NAM. Likely means more WAA introduced quicker into the SE
The 3k NAM will nail that warm nose.The main Baja SW is further ahead the kicker on the NAM. Likely means more WAA introduced quicker into the SE
I generally find with these maps it’s best not to look at the predicted totals outside their region of interest. He’s a NC weatherman and I wouldn’t look at it outside the state as he’s probably just drawing the lines to look “pretty” outside NC as much as anything and isn’t studying them as closely as their forecast area. Same with -------- or any other TV met, IMO. Maybe I’m wrong.I hate to nitpick but If Gainesville to Hartwell to anderson only gets a dusting to 1 inch this system would be a major bust. No guidance shows so little so not sure where he's getting that from
Yeah it well. If it agrees with the RGEM, it isnt a lock but it is as close as you can get.The 3k NAM will nail that warm nose.
Yeah, really pushing up heights in Tenn. valley vs. prior runs.Hour 36 on NAM, pretty substantial shift in the tilt
Not the surface I'm worried for. Need the upper levels to chill off fast. The window is still open this run for that.
Bet we get more qpf though lol.The main Baja SW is further ahead the kicker on the NAM. Likely means more WAA introduced quicker into the SE
Fairly typical overrunning event here in the SE US on Friday.
Mid-level warm advection and isentropic upglide are the main forcing mechanisms for generating precip here.
Both are staples of southern slider events like this.
View attachment 161208
View attachment 161209
Prob gonna result in a snowier finger band further eastBet we get more qpf though lol.
Absolutely, although I’d personally expect it to underdo IP versus ZR oftentimes. So would expect some of that ZR to verify as IP (hopefully).It’s not necessarily the freezing rain maps, but the thermals. I haven’t paid attention recently, but Ive watched the RGEM school the other short range models in the past.
Atlanta might benefit this run. Also a thinner band of ZR at 48.Prob gonna result in a snowier finger band further east
I don’t even know what we want…we want it both slightly more amped but colder. How does that even work.NAM might grant some wishes here. This is what y’all wanted let’s see if it can meet the compromise and tie that fine line View attachment 161251
Oh man! I would say those were the days but that was the day! Lol…I remember telling my son, please enjoy this one. This could be a once in a lifetime for you here in Georgia especially living in Dallas Georgia.Yep, my part of Georgia we haven’t seen a trace of snow since the surprise foot in Dec 2017
Absolutely, although I’d personally expect it to underdo IP versus ZR oftentimes. So wouldn’t expect some of that ZR to verify as IP (hopefully).
I’ll take my chances on more qpf, if temps aren’t quite there I’ll enjoy my sleet. Rather have a lot of something than a little of nothing.I don’t even know what we want…we want it both slightly more amped but colder. How does that even work.
here's a phrase from the archive- rates will matter- there could be a place like asheboro that gets maybe nothing because their precip is light at 34 and nothing sticks, whereas pittsboro gets a band and gets a sloppy 3-4 (all arbitrary examples)Generally, these types of events favor a general 1-3” / 2-4” broad swath of snow accumulation without as many winners and losers (i.e. situations where someone gets banded on and gets 6” while their neighbors get 1.5”) as a more amped system, right? Or am I remembering wrong? Been a while since we had one of these, haha!
we wish for more precip which tugs our low inland, bombs it, and rains on us. So we get what we wanted but also don’t. It’s a lot of fun this placeI don’t even know what we want…we want it both slightly more amped but colder. How does that even work.
My take on these maps, NWS forecasts and many recent model runs is that there is a great deal of uncertainty in precip type. The good news is the trends are for colder temps during precip. and greater chances that precip is in frozen form even south of I-20 in GA. Many models are showing over .75 total QPF for ATL area give or take 50 miles north or south. Many times in my life, I have seen precip types in a scenario like this be uncertain until it is actually falling. That could very well be the case Friday. The other thing I have seen in situation like this one is that the northern side of the highest QPF is a very good place to be if you want a winter storm.This is such a strange map. Gainesville and Cherokee county 1-5" but in shading for 4-6? Atlanta less than 2" but on the border of 2-3 and 3-4?
I’ll take my chances on more qpf, if temps aren’t quite there I’ll enjoy my sleet. Rather have a lot of something than a little of nothing.
Yea, our elevation here has helped us many of times in the past. Malak05, you and I are in the highest elevation area of western Paulding county.It always seems too due to multitude of factors timing, elevation, frontogenesis in big storms a small stretch on the west side always gets a surprise bump in snow.
6z AI...been rock solid for places west of NC...for Raleigh the writing on the wall.
View attachment 161224View attachment 161225