Hmmm: UKIE's 12Z has FAY in rain Sat. morning, but model soundings are all snow. Sensing some shenanigans. Wait for the ensemble before burning any Team UKIE jerseys. View attachment 160871
here's where i've landed- we want a mix of both- positive tilt on the southern half and more negative on the northern half. we want the entire trough to look like a bowSee what you are saying there. So many of us want the trough to tilt positive overall, but sharpen to neutral at the base
I think this continues,View attachment 160808We keep increasing each run
I expect a WS Watch by Wed morning and a warning by Thursday morningThese model trends are looking awesome for North Alabama. When do they normally start looking at putting out watches?
On a side note, I want to personally thank the peeps that put the time and effort posting the models, the evaluations of those models, and the ones that take time to fulfill the IMBY requests. You guys are the real heroes!
Yeah some of the precip maps on pivotal aren't aligning with soundings, could be rate issues but the snow maps solid 2-4
Example: map showing rain with this sounding, borderline bl but below freezing through the column
View attachment 160866
I’m placing my bets on watches going out tonight. They are already out to our west and there’s less model agreement for those areas.I expect a WS Watch by Wed morning and a warning by Thursday morning
I'm trying to figure with the Canadian and UKmet solutions, how much of the 1st initial northern stream shortwave interacted initially vs what the NAM and GFS did (along with the ICON to some extent) keeping it separated more.I have not looked close... But is it possible to that the type maps are showing rain because the dendritic growth region is not adequately saturated?.....
Things to look at for sure
i think they arrive later than everything else, well after the euro ensI've been swamped today. I can go back and look at the Physics models. My question in laymans terms is how have the AI models shook out this morning? same as 0z/ last nights?
This is something I’ve noticed. I think on its depiction on Pivotal, it automatically shows anything below the 540 line as rain, but as some mets on here have pointed out in the past, the 540 line was often doesn’t match with the R/S line in this region. The track of the low was roughly the sameHmmm: UKIE's 12Z has FAY in rain Sat. morning, but model soundings are all snow. Sensing some shenanigans. Wait for the ensemble before burning any Team UKIE jerseys. View attachment 160871
The loop of the 12z Ukie, looked like it transferred to GA coast from central GA? weird, instead of just a straight route from point A. (Pensacola) to point B. (Ga/SC coast)I'm trying to figure with the Canadian and UKmet solutions, how much of the 1st initial northern stream shortwave interacted initially vs what the NAM and GFS did (along with the ICON to some extent) keeping it separated more.
it's not the mid levels it's sniffing out, it's surface temps i think. another issue the skimpier wave solutions bring is 2m temps. i know "rates overcome all" is basically a meme but surface temps are meh and heavier precip will stabilize it. the gfs actually has mixing/surface temp issues for me in richmond on saturday. i wouldn't overlook this as a risk of the flatter solutionsHmmm: UKIE's 12Z has FAY in rain Sat. morning, but model soundings are all snow. Sensing some shenanigans. Wait for the ensemble before burning any Team UKIE jerseys. View attachment 160871
Canadian injected more energy into the Baja Low with the 1st northern stream s/w... Way more than the GFS/ICON didI'm trying to figure with the Canadian and UKmet solutions, how much of the 1st initial northern stream shortwave interacted initially vs what the NAM and GFS did (along with the ICON to some extent) keeping it separated more.
Man, that downtown AVL downslope effect is brutal.Euro ticked north/warmer View attachment 160878
I think that is a good analysis of the situation as it stands. The strength of the CAD is going to be crucial to determining the precipitation type for folks from RDU south and east. I wish there was a reinforcing high pressure to the north of this system but no such luck. Hopefully that low will track more east and give folks here a better chance of seeing all snow.My thoughts on the storm for NC rn
I think the CLT metro area is far enough west that we should stay all frozen, plus I still think the CAD element is being downplayed. We won't have the classic 1040 High but modelling does show a weak high initially in a good placement that later slides east and I think others have pointed out yesterday the potential of a meso high. Despite ppls opinions on him, I think ------------- as a good handle on this event for this region. This may well be a classic I-85 split. I think Statesville up through GSO might be the big winners here.
The RDU/Triangle area is more precarious. Areas east of I-95 have the biggest chance of switching to rain while from I-95 west up to I-74 is honestly too unpredictable for me to make a comfortable call lol. If CAD is stronger than modeled/the low is more to the east then RDU might be a similar position to CLT but if the low tracks further west and the CAD is scoured our faster then rain might become a bigger issue.
Never bet on Atlanta. Whether it's the Super Bowl or snow, you will lose.
Atlanta is getting a dusting with that…
From Wake, Chatham all the way to Iredell
Both the Canadian, and UKMET did a transfer. The GFS/ICON didn't or kept the primary low far enough south, the energy transfer was barely noticed. The Canadian still infused a little bit of the 1st northern stream energy, actually literally came down from due north of the Baja Low back on hour24, where the GFS/ICON/NAM didn't do so.The loop of the 12z Ukie, looked like it transferred to GA coast from central GA? weird, instead of just a straight route from point A. (Pensacola) to point B. (Ga/SC coast)