Yup. It was never gonna crash in one run. But that was a nice step. Excited to look at it in more detail laterLooks like RDU stays below freezing for the whole event now. For me that was the benchmark to get to with the GFS today.
Going to continue, playing catch upI am sure the NWS offices are a bunch of busy bees over these past 24 hours of model runs.... Who knows when it will slow down it keeps trending better and better
See what you are saying there. So many of us want the trough to tilt positive overall, but sharpen to neutral at the basesmall detail but love the trough orientation becoming more negative over the plains, talked about this last night
Same here, stayed at or below freezing entire time. It was close but that's improvement, again need it shift south/east another 100 miles or so to feel comfortableLooks like RDU stays below freezing for the whole event now. For me that was the benchmark to get to with the GFS today.
It almost always is. I think we should be skeptical of all snow solutions until more models jump on board with thatBrad P thinking 1-3 in CLT but a bust lower is more likely than a bust higher. He thinks mixing will be an issue.
Did it show texas getting shafted this whole time?Why are we wasting time watching trends on all these model runs when the Euro AI is like “where you guys been all week?”
The consistency on the Euro AI has been pretty incredibleWhy are we wasting time watching trends on all these model runs when the Euro AI is like “where you guys been all week?”
I hope so as we need snow here in the lowcountryA couple more trends like this by the GFS and it will be an all snow event for many in the Carolina's
Texas hasn't gotten shafted yet.Did it show texas getting shafted this whole time?
Don’t know but we could probably find out (may not want to know that answer though lol)Did it show texas getting shafted this whole time?
More separation from the 1st n/s s/w and the Baja Low a tick south.NAM is a complete crash and burn for Texas and Oklahoma. Wow. 6 to 12 inches fantasy runs to... nothing?
View attachment 160805
Basically cut and paste for Charlotte, especially if you’re south/east of LKN.If you’re in/near Atlanta, specifically south of 20, this will be easier on yourself if you accept now that there will very likely be mixing issues at some point. It’s going to come down to that front end thump for the city and how much we can lay down before temps above start to warm and there’s a flip to IP/ZR. Root hard for the front end thump
I go to school at UTC (UT at chattanooga) and I'm feeling great rn! I appreciate reading all of your guys' posts
This a fairly accurate look here. Ratios farther south might not be the greatest. Dealt with the problem up here in Roanoke with the storm a couple days ago.The snowfall maps don't account for melting/show actual accumulations, right? Like the GFS shows 4-5"+ swath of snowfall around ATL metro but the snow depth map from TT shows ~3". How accurate is this? I just want to temper expectations on the "snowfall" maps that we always see if they are significantly different than actual accumulationsView attachment 160847
Tale as old as time. Frosty on the northern fringe. Boom, gets a foot.Bring it home to Frosty Land, Jimmy Jam. I seem to be in the minimum on just about every output. So need little help pal. They should be locked in by 00z tomorrow night.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A lot of mets seem to think the warm nose is a major concern, Maybe the canadian is onto something? It's short range model also shows sleet. But they are the outliers as of nowCanadian is colder at the surface for some (what else is new?) but it has a weird 700 mb inversion not shown by other models thats making sleet the predominant p-type where other models have snow.