• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry 1/7/17-1/10/17 Winter Storm

About this time frame seen the hearts ripped out of many
 
Storm5 said:
Rain Cold said:
Americans come slightly north and warmer.
I'm with you on the north . but the euro is all alone with its warmer solution cause it drags butt with the NS . so I don't think they go to that extreme.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

I think your right. I believe it will trend towards the Canadian.
 
MiddleTNWx said:
I am in northern middle TN, so I need this thing to either come in much further NW...or have the Thursday night system overperform.

Both would be great!
 
0z nam is a east with the low over Oregon and west with the energy on Montana

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
 
116 guests. take 30 seconds to sign up . we are most likely gonna have to turn certain settings off later in the week to handle traffic and it won't allow you to view the board unless you are a member .

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
SD said:
0z nam is a east with the low over Oregon and west with the energy on Montana

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk


That's bad, right? We need those two to be further apart?
 
So far, once again, slightly more phasing between the northern stream disturbance and the ULL over Oregon
 
Beware the Doctor. Crusher of dreams.
 
Hoping for a slight north/west trend with Chattanooga as the target! ;) This teacher needs to use her built in snow days this year.
 
Benholio said:
SD said:
0z nam is a east with the low over Oregon and west with the energy on Montana

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk


That's bad, right? We need those two to be further apart?

For those near/south of the I-20 corridor in south-central Mississippi, Alabama, & Georgia this is a favorable trend toward more wintry wx
 
Webberweather53 said:
Benholio said:
SD said:
0z nam is a east with the low over Oregon and west with the energy on Montana

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk


That's bad, right? We need those two to be further apart?

For those near/south of the I-20 corridor in south-central Mississippi, Alabama, & Georgia this is a favorable trend toward more wintry wx

And bad for RDU :mad:
 
MiddleTNWx said:
I am in northern middle TN, so I need this thing to either come in much further NW...or have the Thursday night system overperform.

Me too, I'm about 20-25 minutes north of you in White House.
 
I could be wrong (probably am), @33, Nam looks similar to 18z run at 500MB
 
CobraMedic said:
Beware the Doctor. Crusher of dreams.


Or neighborhood drunk


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Keep bringing me good news Webber
 
PowellVolz said:
stormcentral said:
Watching closely from TN VALLEY! ?


Me to. I'm just north of Knoxville


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
a
Chattanooga here. This baby's coming Northwest ?
 
Well, that Carolina and Clemson game was almost as nerveracking as the model watching.
 
Cary_Snow95 said:
Webberweather53 said:
Benholio said:
SD said:
0z nam is a east with the low over Oregon and west with the energy on Montana

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk


That's bad, right? We need those two to be further apart?

For those near/south of the I-20 corridor in south-central Mississippi, Alabama, & Georgia this is a favorable trend toward more wintry wx

And bad for RDU :mad:

Nah, it's a different story for the Carolinas... We'll also have to watch the evolution of the shortwave currently in the Eurasian arctic, this system will be over the Great Lakes ~ 4 days. If this digs southwestward and slows down, our southern branch disturbance would get turned northward & vis versa.
 
It'll be interesting to see how much energy the nam brings through the 4 corners around 60hrs

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
 
NAM doesn't look too different from 18z imo, the first wave looks a little juicier so there's that.... or not.
 
Lol hoping us in KCHA get some good snow. its been a few years now but again we got most of the winter weather over the past few events im willing to share with MS, AL, NC & SC.
 
Webberweather53 said:
Cary_Snow95 said:
Webberweather53 said:
Benholio said:
SD said:
0z nam is a east with the low over Oregon and west with the energy on Montana

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk


That's bad, right? We need those two to be further apart?

For those near/south of the I-20 corridor in south-central Mississippi, Alabama, & Georgia this is a favorable trend toward more wintry wx

And bad for RDU :mad:

Nah, it's a different story for the Carolinas... We'll also have to watch the evolution of the shortwave currently in the Eurasian arctic, this system will be over the Great Lakes ~ 4 days. If this digs southwestward and slows down, our southern branch disturbance would get turned northward & vis versa.

Similar to a phase almost once it turns up the Atlantic?
 
metwannabe said:
NAM doesn't look too different from 18z imo, the first wave looks a little juicier so there's that.... or not.

I'll take it since the first wave is all the models want to give me lately.
 
Energy flat as a pancake at 48 hrs on latest nam! More interaction, sadly.
 
Not much northern stream interaction at 500mb on NAM...looking good!!
ee0e71b1a987ee3526e5fccda9a58ed9.gif
 
If this keeps up there's going to be nothing left with all the intetaction.
 
Can the northern stream please just clear out of the way geez

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
 
LOL, two completely different views back to back.
 
haha again, contrast in posts from opinion to opinion here. I'm just hoping that there's some clarity by 12z tomorrow
 
SD said:
It'll be interesting to see how much energy the nam brings through the 4 corners around 60hrs

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk

Yeah way too early to project how it ends, no doubt it gets sheared, all modeling does that it seems it's more about how it survives once the ns starts pushing out ahead as you said before no way around the interaction
 
03277463b963fd2f60edd679f5b6dc13.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Models should be getting close to a consensus now that we're close to 72 hours from the event right ?
 
I'm fairly novice, but I'm preeeeeetttttttyyyyyy sure that the last run shows both our disturbance and the northern stream interacting with each other, I just hope it doesn't tear it up completely, but it's going to happen... (interaction, that is)
 
IDK how anyone can say that there is not more interaction, I have 2 of my monitors on a constant updating frame by frame with 18z on the left and 00z on the right. Much more interaction and flattening @54. Also the surface-850 is warmer.
 
whatalife said:
03277463b963fd2f60edd679f5b6dc13.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
there she is

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 
Also our S/W Is less amped. Just a bad run. Hopefully the rest of the 00z suite doesn't follow the NAM!
 
Jeez that sw looks like stretch armstrong between two big kids.....
 
MiddleTNWx said:
I am in northern middle TN, so I need this thing to either come in much further NW...or have the Thursday night system overperform.

If memory serves me correct I can think of several snow shower events that have proceeded deep layers of cold air as they enter...wouldn't shock me if it did over perform Thursday Night for you.
 
Just trending worse and worse as we get closer. This sucks.
 
Cary_Snow95 said:
Webberweather53 said:
Cary_Snow95 said:
Webberweather53 said:
Benholio said:
That's bad, right? We need those two to be further apart?

For those near/south of the I-20 corridor in south-central Mississippi, Alabama, & Georgia this is a favorable trend toward more wintry wx

And bad for RDU :mad:

Nah, it's a different story for the Carolinas... We'll also have to watch the evolution of the shortwave currently in the Eurasian arctic, this system will be over the Great Lakes ~ 4 days. If this digs southwestward and slows down, our southern branch disturbance would get turned northward & vis versa.

Similar to a phase almost once it turns up the Atlantic?


It would essentially at least partially phase with this system. The orientation wrt that s/w is key as well, because if the models once again are too fast and shallow with it like they were with our first northern stream PV lobe that will shear our disturbance in the north-central Rockies, then things could get interesting here. If the 2nd shortwave in the northern stream slows and digs, with the southern branch system to it's SE, the area of low pressure off the Carolinas would start to intensify more quickly, turn northward and the entire longwave trough axis would acquire more of a negative tilt which is what's currently shown by the UKMET, JMA, and to some extent the CMC/ECMWF. If you see a southern branch shortwave run out in front an incoming s/w in the northern branch, that's usually conducive to a longwave trough digging more rapidly and phasing the two (or more) streams. Just a possible scenario atm, we'll probably get much closer to an answer on this in another 36 hrs or so... Regardless, I think at this pt, it'll probably be pretty hard to avoid at least a minor event somewhere in central NC.
 
Back
Top