Big dogs are usually defined by a long wave trough axis, full latitude upper air with hard right at base, vs shortwave.
Yeah, we really need the energy to be consolidated at the south, which the GFS has but then lost.Big dogs are usually defined by a long wave trough axis, full latitude upper air with hard right at base, vs shortwave.
I'm procrastinating on leg day by overanalyzing the 18z and it just feels really blippy. It took a weird jolt. 30 hours in on the GFS and there's nothing that makes me say "hey thats IT!", if anything I thought our s/w (east of that little tail on Alaska) actually looked a little better and primed to take a dive.
Better how? Do you have a different map?
It held less of the energy.Better how? Do you have a different map?
The bottom was the 12z runBetter how? Do you have a different map?
Nice. Thanks for posting. I’ve been excited for the possibilities with this storm, especially since you posted the CIPS analogs earlier. Seems like most of the time they show systems that miss us to the north with the dreaded NW trend for potential events we track. The one you posted today hit NC flush. Do you find the CIPS to be accurate?
how did it look in scIn fact, 42/50 members have a light event here, that’s pretty solid
I find when the majority of CIPS analogs are high it does correlate. But, would rather see them tomorrow back it up.Nice. Thanks for posting. I’ve been excited for the possibilities with this storm, especially since you posted the CIPS analogs earlier. Seems like most of the time they show systems that miss us to the north with the dreaded NW trend for potential events we track. The one you posted today hit NC flush. Do you find the CIPS to be accurate?
You can’t live in NC right now and look at these and think “this one looks over for us, rip, out to sea, not going to work” .. let’s remember were 5 days away and we are NW trend magnets inside 2 days .. scrumptious to say the leastThat’s a lot of light members for most of NC and some big members in ENCView attachment 110241View attachment 110242
I personally think the sampling argument is more valid in a set up like this when we’re completely needing phasing to develop the storm.If this comes back and slams the East Coast can we put the 4-7 day dead zone, lack of sampling argument to rest with affirmation, once and for all?
It definitely is. Trying to guess what these pieces of energy are going to do without adequate sampling of them is almost pointless.I personally think the sampling argument is more valid in a set up like this when we’re completely needing phasing to develop the storm.
GFS continues to underperform on the strength of the western ridge. We want it tall and sharp so that our energy can’t hopefully continue to dig as far south as possible.For us dummies...meaning??
Agreed. I've been looking at this too.I think I am reading this differently than most. That lead wave that gets buried is not really the "storm". It's the trailing wave. The initial wave is basically carving the trough for the trailing wave.
In fact, in the 18z run from Saturday that went bonkers, the lead wave did exactly the same thing as it did on the 18z run today. The difference as I've been saying is that the trailing wave was tugged west by it, whereas on more recent runs it's maintained more separation and doesn't drive south but instead southeast, not allowing enough space and time to amplify.
Frankly, I think we should be rooting for the 18z GFS trend to continue, but pulling in the trailing wave(s)/trough. Maybe I missing something.
View attachment 110248
View attachment 110247