Kylo
Member
And Fishel said it may not stick. I didn’t realize it would be that warm tomorrow into Wednesday.WRAL going with a 5% chance of 4” or more in the Triangle. They got the WPC playbook and are running it step by step.
And Fishel said it may not stick. I didn’t realize it would be that warm tomorrow into Wednesday.WRAL going with a 5% chance of 4” or more in the Triangle. They got the WPC playbook and are running it step by step.
I think the fact it's an overachiever to our NW ME is giving false hope to many in Alabama and Georgia. Does not mean it will translate South and east
Sent from my SM-J320VPP using Tapatalk
Lol he predicted 1/2” for my area on the december system and I ended up with 6”!! He said that the ground was to warm to support significant accumulation. Big bust.And yet, he's said on TV a few minutes ago that if it over performs here, we wouldn't see over 2 inches
does not mean it won't either...have heard several mets saying it will have to be watched for thatI think the fact it's an overachiever to our NW its giving false hope to many in Alabama and Georgia. Does not mean it will translate South and east
Sent from my SM-J320VPP using Tapatalk
I think the fact it's an overachiever to our NW its giving false hope to many in Alabama and Georgia. Does not mean it will translate South and east
Sent from my SM-J320VPP using Tapatalk
I think the fact it's an overachiever to our NW its giving false hope to many in Alabama and Georgia. Does not mean it will translate South and east
Sent from my SM-J320VPP using Tapatalk
Yes it did initialized with not a big enough area of precip back in Arkansas.Saw this. Does anyone know it it's true?
NAM is both too slow and too dry with initialization, particularly west of the Mississippi River. That will likely mean amounts a bit higher
An Overachiever in Alabama and an overachiever back towards Memphis are two different ball games. We will have a weakening line regardless , no getting around it . But 2 inches would be better than a half inch for suredoes not mean it won't either...have heard several mets saying it will have to be watched for that
Good the slower the betterBeen waiting 3 hours for just a little shift to the south. Not happening and it's killing me seeing my friends just north of me take a pounding
Absolutely....hug your model of choice, but over performance in one place does not translate to over performance elsewhere
Watch the expansion of echoes back around TX/AR/LA
I don't know I've seen these lines die out after a while. I'd rather go ahead and get mine. Hope you get yours tooGood the slower the better
Sent from my SM-J320VPP using Tapatalk
I think the fact it's an overachiever to our NW its giving false hope to many in Alabama and Georgia. Does not mean it will translate South and east
Sent from my SM-J320VPP using Tapatalk
I agree. I think it’s getting people’s hopes up some, especially in the Carolinas.
Not talking about the Carolinas. I said Alabama and GeorgiaHow would it not translate further east into the Carolinas, it's not a coincidence most of the 0z NWP models just beefed up the QPF over central-eastern NC on the 0z suite in concurrence w/ the higher verification further NW. Sure we've seen over performing storms before but you don't think its a little ridiculous to say the least when there's an order of magnitude more snow than forecast upstream to say that this won't implicate those downstream because it certainly has already for central-western TN & AR. This storm has taken overachievement to a whole other dimension in parts of KY & MO. The excess and poorly forecast precipitation here is associated w/ diabatic heating that generates cyclonic potential vorticity which grows exponentially upscale and amplifies the downstream wave pattern. It does certainly have an effect, and it may be pretty significant given what's happened thus far...
Not talking about the Carolinas. I said Alabama and Georgia
Sent from my SM-J320VPP using Tapatalk
David Chandley said there wouldn’t even be precip in N GA for the early December storm. Nuff said thereDavid Chandley Fox 5 is convinced that the Atlanta area will have scattered snow showers and flurries, some folks will see nothing. FWIW
How would it not translate further east into the Carolinas in some form or fashion? It's not a coincidence most of the 0z NWP models just beefed up the QPF over central-eastern NC on the 0z suite in concurrence w/ the higher verification further NW. Sure we've seen over performing storms before but you don't think its a little ridiculous to say the least when there's an order of magnitude more snow than forecast upstream to say that this won't implicate those downstream because it certainly has already for central-western TN & AR. This storm has taken overachievement to a whole other dimension in parts of KY & MO. The excess and poorly forecast precipitation here is associated w/ diabatic heating that generates cyclonic potential vorticity which grows exponentially upscale and amplifies the downstream wave pattern. It does certainly have an effect, and it may be pretty significant given what's happened thus far...
Get your weather information here. Those clowns on tv are clueless.David Chandley Fox 5 is convinced that the Atlanta area will have scattered snow showers and flurries, some folks will see nothing. FWIW
WHAT...Snow expected. Plan on slippery road conditions,
including during the morning commute on Tuesday. Total snow
accumulations of up to two inches are expected.
UKMet looks good for my area
Are there any UKMET snowfall total maps ?
Yes, I saw it, I posted it here just a short while ago and Stu Ostro of the Weather Channel (presumably a reliable source of information) posted it in a gif image w/ the radar accompanied by surface observations and it was still snowing hard at the time of the 1 foot observationWebber, where did you see that report of almost a foot of snow in southwest Kentucky? I read a post from about an hour ago on Facebook that said something about 6-8inches being reported. Did you see a report of it being closer to a foot then that because that's not really close to a foot.
yep, used the limestone/madison line to say up to two west, up to one east..I"m right on the lineHUN did up snow totals in the WWA for my area.
Does this include Toney or is it closeyep, used the limestone/madison line to say up to two west, up to one east..I"m right on the line
I noticed on the surface map (as of 3z) a SLP has developed on the arctic front right along the TN/AL border and there's a 1033mb HP situated over the NC/VA border. Could either or both of those features be having an impact on the progression of the arctic front. It's moving south across the Arklatex region a little faster than it is moving SE across states further east.
Don't think so, just precip, which is really most important at this point.
Hey man, I’m a fan of it happening, sure. But seeing if it will is another thing. I guess we will find out soon enough!How would it not translate further east into the Carolinas in some form or fashion? It's not a coincidence most of the 0z NWP models just beefed up the QPF over central-eastern NC on the 0z suite in concurrence w/ the higher verification further NW. Sure we've seen over performing storms before but you don't think its a little ridiculous to say the least when there's an order of magnitude more snow than forecast upstream to say that this won't implicate those downstream because it certainly has already for central-western TN & AR. This storm has taken overachievement to a whole other dimension in parts of KY & MO. The excess and poorly forecast precipitation here is associated w/ diabatic heating that generates cyclonic potential vorticity which grows exponentially upscale and amplifies the downstream wave pattern. It does certainly have an effect, and it may be pretty significant given what's happened thus far...