• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern January Joke

so are we mad at the 12z Euro or something? Ive lost the plot

More or less the Euro/AI had a cold shot around 1/12-1/13 and then another one later on. Details need to be refined as we get closer, but that’s what I got out of it..haven’t seen the EPS or AI ensemble.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: SD
More or less the Euro/AI had a cold shot around 1/12-1/13 and then another one later on. Details need to be refined as we get closer, but that’s what I got out of it..haven’t seen the EPS or AI ensemble.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I mean, I could draw up better runs than the 12z OP Euro, sure—but holy cow, you’d think these runs were just printing endless SERs.
 
The EPS has above to much above for the US east of the Rockies for the entirety of its run past this weekend. The only solace is that it does reload Canadian cold at the end, fwiw.

1767388959202.png
 
The EPS has above to much above for the US east of the Rockies for the entirety of its run past this weekend. The only solace is that it does reload Canadian cold at the end, fwiw.

View attachment 180894
That is true. But it wasn't too many runs ago that it was showing a lot of cold. And it wasn't too many weeks ago it was showing warm in the long range that required a jacket when verification arrived. These models have been bouncing around in cycles showing good and bad outcomes. Every. Single. One of them.

The reality is, it has been cold and it has been warm. I don't see any convincing evidence to suggest that the models are more apt to be right when they're showing warm than they are when they're showing cold. If you want to suggest that climate change compels us to lean in the direction of warm, ok, that's a fair point. But you (and I'm not saying you specifically) can't convince me that the rest of the winter is shot, that February is auto-toast, and that we're going to go through another winter with no snow. Other than feelings, I don't see any solid evidence for that.

Every single person that has posted on this forum that has made a forecast (and I don't mean a winter forecast) or a "suggestion" about an upcoming period and every single person who has been quoted here from other sources, like X, doing the same has already been wrong more than once. So, just because someone has changed their cold forecast to warm is irrelevant, at least to me. The weather has been variable. It is likely to continue to be. And models will continue to waffle in the long range. We just don't have the computing skill to be accurate that far out in time, at least not yet.

We're fine.
 
That is true. But it wasn't too many runs ago that it was showing a lot of cold. And it wasn't too many weeks ago it was showing warm in the long range that required a jacket when verification arrived. These models have been bouncing around in cycles showing good and bad outcomes. Every. Single. One of them.

The reality is, it has been cold and it has been warm. I don't see any convincing evidence to suggest that the models are more apt to be right when they're showing warm than they are when they're showing cold. If you want to suggest that climate change compels us to lean in the direction of warm, ok, that's a fair point. But you (and I'm not saying you specifically) can't convince me that the rest of the winter is shot, that February is auto-toast, and that we're going to go through another winter with no snow. Other than feelings, I don't see any solid evidence for that.

Every single person that has posted on this forum that has made a forecast (and I don't mean a winter forecast) or a "suggestion" about an upcoming period and every single person who has been quoted here from other sources, like X, doing the same has already been wrong more than once. So, just because someone has changed their cold forecast to warm is irrelevant, at least to me. The weather has been variable. It is likely to continue to be. And models will continue to waffle in the long range. We just don't have the computing skill to be accurate that far out in time, at least not yet.

We're fine.

One thing this winter and last have had is actual pattern evolution unlike pretty much all of winter 2020 until autumn of 2024. It was awful to just see patterns stuck for so long. It lead to a repeating cycle of drought and flood for too many of us. Some folks may like it or not but at least what we have now is a return to something "more" normal.
 
That is true. But it wasn't too many runs ago that it was showing a lot of cold. And it wasn't too many weeks ago it was showing warm in the long range that required a jacket when verification arrived. These models have been bouncing around in cycles showing good and bad outcomes. Every. Single. One of them.

The reality is, it has been cold and it has been warm. I don't see any convincing evidence to suggest that the models are more apt to be right when they're showing warm than they are when they're showing cold. If you want to suggest that climate change compels us to lean in the direction of warm, ok, that's a fair point. But you (and I'm not saying you specifically) can't convince me that the rest of the winter is shot, that February is auto-toast, and that we're going to go through another winter with no snow. Other than feelings, I don't see any solid evidence for that.

Every single person that has posted on this forum that has made a forecast (and I don't mean a winter forecast) or a "suggestion" about an upcoming period and every single person who has been quoted here from other sources, like X, doing the same has already been wrong more than once. So, just because someone has changed their cold forecast to warm is irrelevant, at least to me. The weather has been variable. It is likely to continue to be. And models will continue to waffle in the long range. We just don't have the computing skill to be accurate that far out in time, at least not yet.

We're fine.
I suppose the thing that bothers most is that unlike much of December, soon the pattern will flood the northern US and much of Canada with Pacific air along with Chinook for the whole of N. America. The longer we wait to pop a strong PNA in this new pattern and establis cross polar flow, the shorter the window becomes. Particularly for us deep south weenies.
 
Not to bad those of us to the west
Playbook of occasional blue norther Arctic fronts banking up against an SER.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah there’s some good storms and some bad times in there but overall it’s not quite as bad as your usual Nina February, in large part because the Warm Pool is eastward shifted some. This helps suppress the SE ridge to some degree, tho it’s obviously still there in the means.

Iirc, all 5 of these Februarys produced at least one minor winter storm in central NC
 
That is true. But it wasn't too many runs ago that it was showing a lot of cold. And it wasn't too many weeks ago it was showing warm in the long range that required a jacket when verification arrived. These models have been bouncing around in cycles showing good and bad outcomes. Every. Single. One of them.

The reality is, it has been cold and it has been warm. I don't see any convincing evidence to suggest that the models are more apt to be right when they're showing warm than they are when they're showing cold. If you want to suggest that climate change compels us to lean in the direction of warm, ok, that's a fair point. But you (and I'm not saying you specifically) can't convince me that the rest of the winter is shot, that February is auto-toast, and that we're going to go through another winter with no snow. Other than feelings, I don't see any solid evidence for that.

Every single person that has posted on this forum that has made a forecast (and I don't mean a winter forecast) or a "suggestion" about an upcoming period and every single person who has been quoted here from other sources, like X, doing the same has already been wrong more than once. So, just because someone has changed their cold forecast to warm is irrelevant, at least to me. The weather has been variable. It is likely to continue to be. And models will continue to waffle in the long range. We just don't have the computing skill to be accurate that far out in time, at least not yet.

We're fine.
Couple look ahead thoughts...

1. I was picking on the GFS last night in terms of how it was handling the jet...but in looking at the model runs today, the EAMT signal is kind of meh, not heavy +EAMT or -EAMT. Having some stout +EAMT episodes would be beneficial for us.

2. Some have made comparisons to 2014, and there's certainly some reason for that when looking at the tropical forcing. Here for Jan 15-30 in 2014, the -VP uplift signal was locked in between 120E and 180 (Dateline)

Jan 2 2014.png

Jan 2 2014 500.png


Most modeling is moving to the same type forcing for the 2nd half of Jan. Here is today's Euro Wk which has this signal from Jan 11 to Feb 16

Jan 2 Wk VP.png


Here is the GEFS out to Jan 19

Jan 2 GEFS.png


So, I think we have to first see if those tropical forcing forecasts verify...and if yes, do we get the W Pac to +TNH / -EPO connection? There is reason to believe that can help us in time...we'll see.
 
Last edited:
I mean model guidance is freakin everywhere. Idk if anyone has truly stopped to think about it. The rug pull with the storm system in that 7th-10th range to a near torch. The post Christmas Winter storm trend from what was supposed to be an above average temperature period for the Northeast. The constant adjustments to cold in November & December in the medium range.

I would be great if we could have a Winter storm pop up on us in the medium range at some point.
 
Couple look ahead thoughts...

1. I was picking on the GFS last night in terms of how it was handling the jet...but in looking at the model runs today, the EAMT signal is kind of meh, not heavy +EAMT or -EAMT. Having some stout +EAMT episodes would be beneficial for us.

2. Some have made comparisons to 2014, and there's certainly some reason for that when looking at the tropical forcing. Here for Jan 15-30 in 2014, the -VP uplift signal was locked in between 120E and 180 (Dateline)

View attachment 180900

View attachment 180903


Most modeling is moving to the same type forcing for the 2nd half of Jan. Here is today's Euro Wk which has this signal from Jan 11 to Feb 16

View attachment 180901


Here is the GEFS out to Jan 19

View attachment 180902


So, I think we have to first see if those tropical forcing forecasts verify...and if yes, do we get the W Pac to +TNH / -EPO connection? There is reason to believe that can help us in time...we'll see.

Yeah there’s some questions as to details going forward.

In a general sense tho, to me it’s more of a matter of when those -VP200a forecasts verify not if, especially when the warmest mean SSTs on the entire planet are sitting around 160E in the equatorial Pacific. MJO or not, convection will want to keep coming back there over and over again the next few months.
 
18z gfs continues the cold bleeds east. Few days ago we were talking about the cold dump out west and not bleeding east.
 
Back
Top