MichaelJ
Member
It's far more subdued on the front end and really highlights a single band that gets going later tomorrow afternoon as the sfc low gets goingYeah orientation seems off seeing the other nam guidance has been showing more east to west oriented maximums.
If this continues it should be interesting to see what solutions we see in the short range high res models as the initialize based on current conditionsThe NAM has DP around here at 40 and it’s currently down to 30 already so this is very interesting to say the least.
A little off topic, but something to note about this storm is that it’s happening with the teleconnections pretty terrible across the board. It just goes to show you can luck into some snow in almost any pattern.
That is absolutely CAD showing up in the upper atmosphere.Here is a map I found of dew points. Is that CAD forming already?
View attachment 35718
That is absolutely CAD showing up in the upper atmosphere.
Well considering even the HRRR is initializing 7 degrees too high for DP, these things absolutely count. It can beat back the warm nose just enough. Especially since I think the NAM is a little TOO amped up as well. You couple those 2 things together and it can only help.Could that save us from that dreaded warm nose?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It would likely keep surface temps cooler but wouldn't stop a warm nose. In February 2015, RDU reported sleet in the upper teens because the warm nose was so strong.Could that save us from that dreaded warm nose?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Of note: The models have been calculating what’s going to happen but the next runs will be from what’s actually happening in the forecast areasHere is a map I found of dew points. Is that CAD forming already?
View attachment 35718
43/40 in Cary currently. Temp dropped 3 degrees In last 20 minutes
Thought Raleigh was a lock, guranteed nada.. you guranteedFinal call:
got that for a little farther west?
How much at BNA?
Nice widespread 2-4” event. Been awhile since we’ve seen one of those.
I appreciate all the maps everyone makes, but this is my favorite. I like the distribution and amounts.Final call:
18z Euro was identical.
Here are comparisons of the 18z NAM and 18z Euro at hour 27, 30, 33. Let's see how this lines up tomorrow. I prefer the juiced up NAM's but means some are toeing the line.
View attachment 35724View attachment 35725View attachment 35726
Would this be a situation where you look at the low placement and meet in the middle for a blend or do you think the nam is right that far north with low placement?
It would likely keep surface temps cooler but wouldn't stop a warm nose. In February 2015, RDU reported sleet in the upper teens because the warm nose was so strong.
I was wondering if that was bright banding or the model trying to enhance precip along the 850mb convergenceOnce you remove the spurious boundary layer issues w/ the HRRR, and pay close attention to this melting layer bright band on its forecast reflectivity output (which is basically where the rain-snow line would be), I'm definitely a fan of where it keeps putting this bright band (which I've circled in white) in the SW piedmont of NC and extreme upstate SC at the start of the event when our air mass is most marginal/least favorable for snow. Everything north of that would be falling as snow, to the south would be rain. Definitely suggests more snow for the GSP-CLT corridor
View attachment 35728
That’s 11am-Noon timeframe and already has the line below 85. This is a warm biased model especially at this range so this has my attention.Once you remove the spurious boundary layer issues w/ the HRRR, and pay close attention to this melting layer bright band on its forecast reflectivity output (which is basically where the rain-snow line would be), I'm definitely a fan of where it keeps putting this bright band (which I've circled in white) in the SW piedmont of NC and extreme upstate SC at the start of the event when our air mass is most marginal/least favorable for snow. Everything north of that would be falling as snow, to the south would be rain.
View attachment 35728
That’s 11am-Noon timeframe and already has the line below 85. This is a warm biased model especially at this range so this has my attention.
Reason being is that CAD events are caused by cold air being trapped by the mountains, leaving a shallow cold layer. Perfect opportunity for a warm nose to leave you with freezing rain.I've watched it rain at 22f before. Warm noses eat CADs for breakfast/lunch/dinner. CAD is terrible for snow.
It should. That line has already set up in northern Union county, the Roebuck and woodruff areas of Spartanburg county, back towards Simpsonville and extreme NE Anderson county. That’s a very good sign from this look.Because that line should only get lower throughout the day? Technically speaking?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I support this analysis! Will be interesting which mesoscale model handles this the best. I'm sure it will differ from area to area.Once you remove the spurious boundary layer issues w/ the HRRR, and pay close attention to this melting layer bright band on its forecast reflectivity output (which is basically where the rain-snow line would be), I'm definitely a fan of where it keeps putting this bright band (which I've circled in white) in the SW piedmont of NC and extreme upstate SC at the start of the event when our air mass is most marginal/least favorable for snow. Everything north of that would be falling as snow, to the south would be rain. Definitely suggests more snow for the GSP-CLT corridor
View attachment 35728
Webber, what does this mean in simpler terms? Are you saying this is where the rain/snow line may set up or are you saying Charlotte may be under one of the heavier bands?Once you remove the spurious boundary layer issues w/ the HRRR, and pay close attention to this melting layer bright band on its forecast reflectivity output (which is basically where the rain-snow line would be), I'm definitely a fan of where it keeps putting this bright band (which I've circled in white) in the SW piedmont of NC and extreme upstate SC at the start of the event when our air mass is most marginal/least favorable for snow. Everything north of that would be falling as snow, to the south would be rain. Definitely suggests more snow for the GSP-CLT corridor
View attachment 35728