• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry February 19-21, 2020 Winter Storm

The NAM has DP around here at 40 and it’s currently down to 30 already so this is very interesting to say the least.
If this continues it should be interesting to see what solutions we see in the short range high res models as the initialize based on current conditions
 
Could that save us from that dreaded warm nose?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well considering even the HRRR is initializing 7 degrees too high for DP, these things absolutely count. It can beat back the warm nose just enough. Especially since I think the NAM is a little TOO amped up as well. You couple those 2 things together and it can only help.
 
Could that save us from that dreaded warm nose?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It would likely keep surface temps cooler but wouldn't stop a warm nose. In February 2015, RDU reported sleet in the upper teens because the warm nose was so strong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ajr
Once you remove the spurious boundary layer issues w/ the HRRR, and pay close attention to this melting layer bright band on its forecast reflectivity output (which is basically where the rain-snow line would be), I'm definitely a fan of where it keeps putting this bright band (which I've circled in white) in the SW piedmont of NC and extreme upstate SC at the start of the event when our air mass is most marginal/least favorable for snow. Everything north of that would be falling as snow, to the south would be rain. Definitely suggests more snow for the GSP-CLT corridor


Screen Shot 2020-02-19 at 7.14.35 PM.png
 
Last edited:
18z Euro was identical.

Here are comparisons of the 18z NAM and 18z Euro at hour 27, 30, 33. Let's see how this lines up tomorrow. I prefer the juiced up NAM's but means some are toeing the line.

View attachment 35724View attachment 35725View attachment 35726

Would this be a situation where you look at the low placement and meet in the middle for a blend or do you think the nam is right that far north with low placement?
 
Would this be a situation where you look at the low placement and meet in the middle for a blend or do you think the nam is right that far north with low placement?

I think the NAM's are a little over amped but I also think the Euro precip shield will be shifted NW more and thus could bring higher totals down I-40 corridor.
 
Once you remove the spurious boundary layer issues w/ the HRRR, and pay close attention to this melting layer bright band on its forecast reflectivity output (which is basically where the rain-snow line would be), I'm definitely a fan of where it keeps putting this bright band (which I've circled in white) in the SW piedmont of NC and extreme upstate SC at the start of the event when our air mass is most marginal/least favorable for snow. Everything north of that would be falling as snow, to the south would be rain. Definitely suggests more snow for the GSP-CLT corridor


View attachment 35728
I was wondering if that was bright banding or the model trying to enhance precip along the 850mb convergence
 
Once you remove the spurious boundary layer issues w/ the HRRR, and pay close attention to this melting layer bright band on its forecast reflectivity output (which is basically where the rain-snow line would be), I'm definitely a fan of where it keeps putting this bright band (which I've circled in white) in the SW piedmont of NC and extreme upstate SC at the start of the event when our air mass is most marginal/least favorable for snow. Everything north of that would be falling as snow, to the south would be rain.


View attachment 35728
That’s 11am-Noon timeframe and already has the line below 85. This is a warm biased model especially at this range so this has my attention.
 
That’s 11am-Noon timeframe and already has the line below 85. This is a warm biased model especially at this range so this has my attention.

Because that line should only get lower throughout the day? Technically speaking?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I've watched it rain at 22f before. Warm noses eat CADs for breakfast/lunch/dinner. CAD is terrible for snow.
Reason being is that CAD events are caused by cold air being trapped by the mountains, leaving a shallow cold layer. Perfect opportunity for a warm nose to leave you with freezing rain.

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
 
Because that line should only get lower throughout the day? Technically speaking?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It should. That line has already set up in northern Union county, the Roebuck and woodruff areas of Spartanburg county, back towards Simpsonville and extreme NE Anderson county. That’s a very good sign from this look.
 
Once you remove the spurious boundary layer issues w/ the HRRR, and pay close attention to this melting layer bright band on its forecast reflectivity output (which is basically where the rain-snow line would be), I'm definitely a fan of where it keeps putting this bright band (which I've circled in white) in the SW piedmont of NC and extreme upstate SC at the start of the event when our air mass is most marginal/least favorable for snow. Everything north of that would be falling as snow, to the south would be rain. Definitely suggests more snow for the GSP-CLT corridor


View attachment 35728
I support this analysis! Will be interesting which mesoscale model handles this the best. I'm sure it will differ from area to area.
 
Once you remove the spurious boundary layer issues w/ the HRRR, and pay close attention to this melting layer bright band on its forecast reflectivity output (which is basically where the rain-snow line would be), I'm definitely a fan of where it keeps putting this bright band (which I've circled in white) in the SW piedmont of NC and extreme upstate SC at the start of the event when our air mass is most marginal/least favorable for snow. Everything north of that would be falling as snow, to the south would be rain. Definitely suggests more snow for the GSP-CLT corridor


View attachment 35728
Webber, what does this mean in simpler terms? Are you saying this is where the rain/snow line may set up or are you saying Charlotte may be under one of the heavier bands?
 
Back
Top