Nope there's no.precip
Looks pretty sufficient for early precip. It’s gaining moisture from another low. The problem would be that it’s not suppressed enough.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nope there's no.precip
Weaker, but looks to be good for the upper south. If you are above the blue lines, it’s probably snow.
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's nice to see many members showing moisture down in the Gulf as well as those members showing a well developed low. Exciting times ahead!Interesting, the GEFS longwave pattern, looks even better this run. While some members aren’t hits, most are setup the way that I definitely see some storm from the members.
![]()
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A true winter like day for everyone in the south this would make up for me in Charlotte at least for all the lost storms this storm signal and H5 pattern is getting very interesting and in a fun wayOnly 50 zillion more runs to reel this one in: View attachment 31125
Good god this could get good really fastI recommend checking out the ensembles if you live north of I-85. Nice look. Longwave pattern verbatim supports a storm.
View attachment 31127View attachment 31128View attachment 31129
That’s an increase from 18z gefsI recommend checking out the ensembles if you live north of I-85. Nice look. Longwave pattern verbatim supports a storm.
View attachment 31127View attachment 31128View attachment 31129
Any experts out there know if this would be at least close to blocking? I know the higher heights are further south and west than our usual west based NAO, but looks close, and wonder if it could still lead to slowing the flowI still like that pattern toward the end of January on the 0z EPS. Trough over the SW US with a decent STJ signal.![]()
Sent from my SM-J727U using Tapatalk
Any experts out there know if this would be at least close to blocking? I know the higher heights are further south and west than our usual west based NAO, but looks close, and wonder if it could still lead to slowing the flow
Coastal going in the wrong direction, if its gonna happen it needs to jump on the NW trend wagon today imho. It's just too suppressed and fast flowGefs looks silent still with the coastal, I’m honestly just interested in that at this point, everything past hour 240 is meh
Totals
![]()
![]()
Agreed. However, I think this look has shown up on every ensemble run for the last 15 days.
I agree. The teles has not and still do not support deep cold locking in.Agreed. However, I think this look has shown up on every ensemble run for the last 15 days.
Today's 6z 384 image:
View attachment 31143
Here's the GEFS at 384 for the 6z run on 1/9, which is as far back as I can go on TT:
View attachment 31138
Now, here's the 6z today @ 216, valid for the same time period:
View attachment 31139
Here's the 6z 384 on 1/10, which looks slightly more like today's image:
View attachment 31142
And, the 240 image from the 6z run today valid at the same time period:
View attachment 31141
I think I see a problem. I'm beginning to think that the ensembles are not quite as accurate as we want to believe.
It sure seems to me that after 7-10 days the Ensembles resort back to historical teleconnection probabilities of what’s supposed to happen and not real-time dynamic computations.Agreed. However, I think this look has shown up on every ensemble run for the last 15 days.
Today's 6z 384 image:
View attachment 31143
Here's the GEFS at 384 for the 6z run on 1/9, which is as far back as I can go on TT:
View attachment 31138
Now, here's the 6z today @ 216, valid for the same time period:
View attachment 31139
Here's the 6z 384 on 1/10, which looks slightly more like today's image:
View attachment 31142
And, the 240 image from the 6z run today valid at the same time period:
View attachment 31141
I think I see a problem. I'm beginning to think that the ensembles are not quite as accurate as we want to believe.
By the time I leave work today dews will be in the 30s
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk