• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry April Fools? (1-2) Surprise Storm

Webberweather53 said:
I just don't think we'll have an issue getting precipitation far enough NW in this instance.

The 3km NAM struggles to push the precipitation further inland due to convective feedback issues in the model that lead to spurious deepening of the low off the SC/NC coast that ultimately deters inland moisture transport vs the 12z NAM whose large-scale depiction of the coastal low is likely more realistic & in line w/ other models.

View attachment 18290
View attachment 18289
Click to expand...

I'm skeptical still, it's not just the 3km NAM. The RGEM I referenced has a sharp gradient with the qpf and drops 1" of snow max with most areas seeing nothing more than a dusting at best. The RGEM also has quite a few ensembles that confine the qpf more to the eastern areas due to a weaker/east LP track. Boundary layer temps will be an issue especially after 8-9am. These temps by 15Z combined with the warm ground and April sun will likely prevent any additional accumulations and melt anything on the ground, IMO, unless rates are quite heavy.
rgem temps .jpg
 
snowlover91 said:
I'm skeptical still, it's not just the 3km NAM. The RGEM I referenced has a sharp gradient with the qpf and drops 1" of snow max with most areas seeing nothing more than a dusting at best. The RGEM also has quite a few ensembles that confine the qpf more to the eastern areas due to a weaker/east LP track. Boundary layer temps will be an issue especially after 8-9am. These temps by 15Z combined with the warm ground and April sun will likely prevent any additional accumulations and melt anything on the ground, IMO, unless rates are quite heavy.
View attachment 18291
Click to expand...

Cases like this w/ modest mid-level WAA, CVA aloft in conjunction with a coastal cyclone almost always end up w/ more expansive & intense precipitation further north & west from the parent cyclone (& is related to overperforming warm noses) and most guidance are evolving as you expect them to in that regard. There are many other issues that will deter snow accumulations but precipitation actually making it far enough inland to roughly the I-85 corridor is likely not going to be one of them, even if "x" model says ______. Boundary layer & ground temps are clearly more of a problem. Places that experience heavy precipitation in upstate SC & lower NC will cool roughly to near or just above 32F due to melting hydrometeors aloft and near the surface, once the precipitation rates dwindle & solar insolation increases, the temps will rise.
 
Last edited:
Webberweather53 said:
Cases like this w/ modest mid-level WAA, CVA aloft in conjunction with a coastal cyclone almost always end up w/ more expansive & intense precipitation further north & west from the parent cyclone (& is related to overperforming warm noses) and most guidance are evolving as you expect them to in that regard. There are many other issues that will deter snow accumulations but precipitation actually making it far enough inland to roughly the I-85 corridor is likely not going to be one of them, even if "x" model says ______. Boundary layer & ground temps are clearly more of a problem. Places that experience heavy precipitation in upstate SC & lower NC will cool roughly to near or just above 32F due to melting hydrometeors aloft and near the surface, once the precipitation rates dwindle & solar insolation increases, the temps will rise.
Click to expand...

We'll see what ends up happening. I'm skeptical of meaningful precip making it that far inland, the RGEM has more precip in SC but a warmer temp profile so a cold rain in these areas. The places cold enough for snow struggle to cool with temps in the 34-36 range. Combined with warm ground temps it will make it quite difficult to see much accumulation IMO. Most of it will melt either as it hits the ground or soon after. I'm expecting most areas that see snow to get a nice 1-3 hour burst of snow with a dusting in some areas and MAYBE an inch of snow if someone gets under a heavy band.

rgem qpf.jpg
 
snowlover91 said:
We'll see what ends up happening. I'm skeptical of meaningful precip making it that far inland, the RGEM has more precip in SC but a warmer temp profile so a cold rain in these areas. The places cold enough for snow struggle to cool with temps in the 34-36 range. Combined with warm ground temps it will make it quite difficult to see much accumulation IMO. Most of it will melt either as it hits the ground or soon after. I'm expecting most areas that see snow to get a nice 1-3 hour burst of snow with a dusting in some areas and MAYBE an inch of snow if someone gets under a heavy band.

View attachment 18294
Click to expand...

Feel free to believe what you want and hug your favorite suite of models, but I think you'll end up being wrong in this regard & "meaningful" precipitation will in fact make it to or even past the I-85 corridor (which is what the professional forecasters at NWS GSP are hedging towards as well).

Warm ground temps play a role in snow accumulation but its usually overstated and that doesn't make it necessarily very difficult or anywhere near impossible to get accumulation (even significant accum) if precipitation rates are heavy. There are innumerable examples of this and this case won't be any different if precip rates are heavy.
 
Webberweather53 said:
Feel free to believe what you want and hug your favorite suite of models, but I think you'll end up being wrong in this regard & "meaningful" precipitation will in fact make it to or even past the I-85 corridor (which is what the professional forecasters at NWS GSP are hedging towards as well).

Warm ground temps play a role in snow accumulation but its usually overstated and that doesn't make it necessarily very difficult or anywhere near impossible to get accumulation (even significant accum) if precipitation rates are heavy.
Click to expand...

We will see what happens. I think the best shot at accumulating snow is going to be in upstate SC similar to what the 3km NAM is showing, they have the best timing with the bulk of it moving through in the early morning hours before solar insolation becomes a factor. The 3km NAM and RGEM generally have .1 to .3" of qpf along the 85 corridor. That's not much to work with considering the other unfavorable factors in play here.

I think the 12z 3km NAM is fairly reasonable but a bit high. A general dusting to an inch in the heavier bands. Once we get past 11am it will be tough to get snow anywhere in NC due to BL temps in the 35-37 range.
3km.jpg
 
It's a terrible model in the long range, I don't like it outside of 8-10 hours, but here's the 12z HRRR.

HRRR.jpg
 
Tarheel1 said:
Jimmy, look!!? from the other board!View attachment 18299View attachment 18300
Click to expand...
LMAOOO. Looks a lot like that Euro/Ukie combo for mby in early December? ? I hope this one pans out a little better than that one. I think areas south of 85 in SC are favored here. If this thing holds, we’re going to see some heavy heavy snow. I’m putting my snow meter at 2% right now
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top