So I got a question. Why not just have the run like it is, with snow behind artic front(overrunning)? That way you don’t have to worry about a low causing WAA problems?? I guess both ways could work.
So I got a question. Why not just have the run like it is, with snow behind artic front(overrunning)? That way you don’t have to worry about a low causing WAA problems?? I guess both ways could work.
Lol, yeah that toSo I got a question. Why not just have the run like it is, with snow behind artic front(overrunning)? That way you don’t have to worry about a low causing WAA problems?? I guess both ways could work.
So I got a question. Why not just have the run like it is, with snow behind artic front(overrunning)? That way you don’t have to worry about a low causing WAA problems?? I guess both ways could work.
well good thing we got about 35 model runs left. ???I would say because arctic fronts with snow on the backside rarely work out. If we had the front to stall and then get a wave to run along it we would have something. The event as modeled doesn't excite me and will back way away from snow 95% of the time as we near the event.
Or it could trend betterI would say because arctic fronts with snow on the backside rarely work out. If we had the front to stall and then get a wave to run along it we would have something. The event as modeled doesn't excite me and will back way away from snow 95% of the time as we near the event.
I was looking at that earlier. As you can see there is shower activity down in the Gulf, which can indicate a devloping low. I'm all in for a Gulf low with a Miller A track, with fresh deep cold air to the north.GFS also appeared to pop somewhat of a low after the frontal passage. It was just further south into the gulf
View attachment 12718
Of it could trend better
well good thing we got about 35 model runs left. ???
Looks like it dries up as it head east
Oh wow, 0z Euro has Gulf low too! Yes!