Snow_chaser
Member
Looking at the maps on the model runs, what am I looking for in regards to the warm nose and where it’s at
I swear the NAM tries so hard to get that deform band going across NC, if that happens at least could end with a bang
So basically it could be colder?
Ill take my trace in Chattanooga lolsHere's the ground truth from the NAM. Looks like a heavy dusting to an inch is the high water mark. The moral of the story is that what we see falling should look beautiful, but it will not pile up on the ground.
Wow thats still a solid inch. I would not complain about that at all.Here's the ground truth from the NAM. Looks like a heavy dusting to an inch is the high water mark. The moral of the story is that what we see falling should look beautiful, but it will not pile up on the ground.
I can see 1-3" out of thisHere's the ground truth from the NAM. Looks like a heavy dusting to an inch is the high water mark. The moral of the story is that what we see falling should look beautiful, but it will not pile up on the ground.
Here's the ground truth from the NAM. Looks like a heavy dusting to an inch is the high water mark. The moral of the story is that what we see falling should look beautiful, but it will not pile up on the ground.
Not wishcasting at all as I expect a minimal impact event. However, be careful with these snow depth algorithms. As ARCC has mentioned, the model is picking up a warm nose from about 950 to the surface and generally warm ground temps. I've seen time and time again, with heavy rates, ground temps can be overcome and accumulation ensues. The same rates can overcome the borderline boundary temps as well. Certainly still and unfolding situation and no need to definitively say anything at this point.Here's the ground truth from the NAM. Looks like a heavy dusting to an inch is the high water mark. The moral of the story is that what we see falling should look beautiful, but it will not pile up on the ground.
Any colder then totals increase?Not wishcasting at all as I expect a minimal impact event. However, be careful with these snow depth algorithms. As ARCC has mentioned, the model is picking up a warm nose from about 950 to the surface and generally warm ground temps. I've seen time and time again, with heavy rates, ground temps can be overcome and accumulation ensues. The same rates can overcome the borderline boundary temps as well. Certainly still and unfolding situation and no need to definitively say anything at this point.
Not wishcasting at all as I expect a minimal impact event. However, be careful with these snow depth algorithms. As ARCC has mentioned, the model is picking up a warm nose from about 950 to the surface and generally warm ground temps. I've seen time and time again, with heavy rates, ground temps can be overcome and accumulation ensues. The same rates can overcome the borderline boundary temps as well. Certainly still and unfolding situation and no need to definitively say anything at this point.
Absolutely. Boundary temps are the main limiting factor attm.Any colder then totals increase?
Difficult to see on my phone but best I can tell looking at thermal profile of the NAM it's so close for us, I mean a degree or 2 and it's game onHere's the ground truth from the NAM. Looks like a heavy dusting to an inch is the high water mark. The moral of the story is that what we see falling should look beautiful, but it will not pile up on the ground.