snowlover91
Member
Last month... lol different scenario I know and not for everyone. But every single model output showed a trace at best and I ended up with 7". So I never fully throw in the towel until that warm snow is fallingJudging from the lack of posts in a busy thread on a busy forum, it’s easy to conclude the 18z GFS sucked. Looking further at the actual model, it does.
While I think there is a chance of the models underestimating the strength of the CAD a tad, I have to agree with 1300m and toss the Canadian eh in favor of some of the other models. If the high were trending south and stronger, I would think differently. But when does anything ever trend south and stronger?
Yeah, I wouldn’t give up on it yet. But if I had to bet, I’d bet very little outside foothills/mountains/far western NC Piedmont and north from there. Just not seeing the Synoptics in place necessary to drive the big high south.Last month... lol different scenario I know and not for everyone. But every single model output showed a trace at best and I ended up with 7". So I never fully throw in the towel until that warm snow is falling
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Last month I predicted 3-6" for Wake County when most were going much lower. I'm not a total moron but this one has got a lot of problems, the biggest being a cold air feed.Yeah, I wouldn’t give up on it yet. But if I had to bet, I’d bet very little outside foothills/mountains/far western NC Piedmont and north from there. Just not seeing the Synoptics in place necessary to drive the big high south.
Wasn’t the track farther south as well? Nothing about this one is trending favorably right now.Last month I predicted 3-6" for Wake County when most were going much lower. I'm not a total moron but this one has got a lot of problems, the biggest being a cold air feed.
Last month I predicted 3-6" for Wake County when most were going much lower. I'm not a total moron but this one has got a lot of problems, the biggest being a cold air feed.
No disagreement. Just offering my forecast as of now. Nothing's ever set in stone, but I'm just not seeing any of the trends that I personally think are needed. It's close for sure for many from Raleigh to GSO, but in the end I doubt it'll be more than a nuisance/Advisory level event at worst.I think 99.9% of people would agree with you. I just like to wait 48 hours or so before I cancel, just in case...what’s the harm in waiting I guess. This storm has an ample amount of problems and it could have got it done, the surface low on this strung out mess just isn’t working for us. I’ve seen highs over the Great Lakes get it done for Raleigh, so there’s always exceptions. This one is just a tad too north.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It should, it has 9km resolution, higher than the RGEM or the 12km NAM.18z Euro. Does Euro do well with 2m/wedges?
View attachment 10487
View attachment 10488View attachment 10490
It should, it has 9km resolution, higher than the RGEM or the 12km NAM.
Cut it about half. That’s how the December storm was.18z FV3 gives me about 8". How reliable is that model?
The color transition scheme from that provider is not helpful at all. The freezing line is important and should serve as a noticeable boundary in the color scheme. It doesn’t. Too bad!18z Euro. Does Euro do well with 2m/wedges?
View attachment 10487
View attachment 10488View attachment 10490
Looks wintry. That the 18z fv-3? Also, how did the precip types from that site pan out with the last one?
Looks wintry. That the 18z fv-3? Also, how did the precip types from that site pan out with the last one?
My recollection it was horrible, had frozen precip much further south than what materializedLooks wintry. That the 18z fv-3? Also, how did the precip types from that site pan out with the last one?
My recollection it was horrible, had frozen precip much further south than what materialized
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk