GeorgiaGirl
Member
Gonna be a bit more direct than I was yesterday…
While an electoral college blowout might occur, I think it’s more likely the winner has 270-287 electoral college votes, and it’s not what’s needed to cool the political bickering, it’ll make it worse (in fact, Harris 270-268 would be a perfect way to put a bow on 2020 because it’d apparently mean the way the census was conducted then costed R’s a presidency).
Only thing in which I think drums up what was seen out of 2016 again is a popular vote loss by democrats here. Otherwise, like I said, the establishment bench is in MUCH better shape than it was nearly a decade ago. You’d probably see Josh Shapiro run in 2028 (or 2032) and he’d have a very good chance.
Edit as I meant to say this and forgot: I actually don’t think Michigan is on the board here. Detroit had terrible turnout in 2016 and so far it hasn’t been here, and folks saying it has been are lying to you.
While an electoral college blowout might occur, I think it’s more likely the winner has 270-287 electoral college votes, and it’s not what’s needed to cool the political bickering, it’ll make it worse (in fact, Harris 270-268 would be a perfect way to put a bow on 2020 because it’d apparently mean the way the census was conducted then costed R’s a presidency).
Only thing in which I think drums up what was seen out of 2016 again is a popular vote loss by democrats here. Otherwise, like I said, the establishment bench is in MUCH better shape than it was nearly a decade ago. You’d probably see Josh Shapiro run in 2028 (or 2032) and he’d have a very good chance.
Edit as I meant to say this and forgot: I actually don’t think Michigan is on the board here. Detroit had terrible turnout in 2016 and so far it hasn’t been here, and folks saying it has been are lying to you.