Yeah the individual is begging for confirmation biased "opinions". He wants 1 outcome and that's for this to be a fake event. To that i will post a Facebook meme.
Shaggy,
I just posted that meme at that forum as part of my defense. Someone else at that same BB (3rd different person I've quoted (not whom I was addressing my response to) and who happens to be a pro met fwiw) said this in response:
"It doesn't at all address how many died/lives were saved and what the price was to save those lives.........which is THE relevant point that people are making.
There is no formula that tells us a life is worth X amount to the rest of the living in lost economic and other things that contribute to the quality of life.
However, we can use precedent..........how about the flu that has been around for many decades.
Using that precedent, the statement above is completely out of line for not recognizing a loss many orders of magnitude greater to peoples lives compared to the deaths."
-------------------------
So, this pro met is saying that our response to the annual flu hasn't been including widespread lockdowns/social distancing, He appears to be saying that the huge increase in measures taken by the govt for COVID-19 cannot possibly be worth the economic damage done to the country. He's been using the lack of major response to the flu over and over for many weeks as a reason why the govt has gone way overboard with COVID-19.
In making this assessment, I'm tempted to ask him how does he know how bad COVID-19 may have gotten with no lockdowns keeping in mind a) how much more contagious, b) how much more severe (longlasting damage in many cases even if not killed) and c) how much more deadly COVID-19 is vs the typical flu.
I'm also tempted to remind him that 1918-9 was a flu and there were lockdowns done then.