I said you should reconsider and if you think a majority of registered voters, let alone Americans voted for him you are sorely mistaken and should take the time to educate yourself before voting. If you choose to stay in the dark about basic facts, how can you expect to vote in a manner that is good for the nation?
You sound a little like Nancy....
I never said I wanted that, did I? I was just correcting a false statement that the author just won't admit was false.
You know what I meant. He won by a whole lot of people. He did. American citizens. Just stop it. You have no business saying anything about someones voting manner.
But he didn't win by a lot of people. He won by electoral votes. I don't even know why I am arguing with you, it appears that you are being willfully ignorant or disengenous about this.
He also won swing states by VERY low margins as well. Too much Hillary hate caused left-leaning demos to either not vote in the General or do a farking write in, or vote for hideous Jill Stein. Sad really.
I don't know why your arguing with me either. Now I'm going to say it like this..A whole lot of people voted for him. A whole lot of people will vote for him next time. He won. He's the President no matter how you break it down or dislike him.
This is the day when I became 100% engaged. The last draw.
What I don't get is why you keep on going saying that holding someone accountable for their actions means you hate them. That's not what it means at all. It means that from what him and many others see, Trump may have violated the law and was caught doing so. It would go for any other president. Have you ever heard of Grantism? I was taught this in us history in 11th grade and it basically states that corruption in an administration, tied to the president or not, occurs about every 50 or so years. Watergate was about that long ago only short a few years. At the time my teacher made the prediction that whoever the president would be in this term would possibly face a corrupt administration and sure enough we are having it. Either angle, from trump ousting a lot of his cabinet he picked himself to trump himself and the Ukraine situation, there has to have been corruption from someone that was caught.
Unfortunately, you're debating with a brick wall most of the time.
There are times I feel like both sides are brick walls. On your side, you believe what you do because of whatever reasons you came to, and on the other side they are the same, but both views will almost never line up. It's up to both people to open their minds and look at every angle to determine what is true or not.
I have never said that someone should not be held accountable for their actions. We all want truth and a clean less corrupted system. There has to be proof and agreement on both sides and we don't have either. People are tired of chasing the crimes for 3 years. Until there is proof there is no way this president or any other president should be removed. There is no way we can even get to the truth without fair trials and court. Witnesses, testimony, the way our system works fairly I mean. I believe it's coming and people will be held accountable but I just don't believe it's Trump. My opinion.