The new oneThat from earlier today? Or a new run?
The new oneThat from earlier today? Or a new run?
It’s old, my bad! 12zThat from earlier today? Or a new run?
Click bait!It’s old, my bad! 12z
We should've expected it, it always pulls some crap just to suck people in only to jerk the rug out from under them...... I hate the NAM. lol0z NAM just put a stop to the good trends....
Yeah that’s disappointing.0z NAM just put a stop to the good trends....
The 0z NAM and 1z HRRR are worlds apart on surface temperatures even out to 10 hours w/ the 3km NAM way warmer than the HRRR, one of these models is going to bust terribly over the midwest and OH/TN valley but I'm not sure which one yet.
View attachment 4775
Hmm this looks strange to me. There's actually more ascent throughout the entire column and especially in the DGZ on this 0z NAM run (which argues for more dynamical cooling) and you'll notice the wind direction and speed in the lower-levels (indicative of veering and warm air advection) is slightly less pronounced & the QPF overall is the same, yet this runs is somehow warmer?
Ok...
View attachment 4777
Well this didn't take long. The 3km NAM is way too warm already over the Carolinas, has temps in the mid-upper 40s for 3z, reality is in the upper 30s-near 40F according to the newest 3z observations. For example it's supposed to be 49F right now in Rockingham, NC it's already 40F there. Other stations like RDU, Clinton, etc. are also running much colder than forecast just 3 hours out. What a dumpster fire this run has turned out to be in the short range thus far
View attachment 4780 View attachment 4781