Showmeyourtds
Member
This was foolish, IMO. Cannot think of a reason to do this.
I can’t either. He did say in his winter outlook he expects a good bit of snow.This was foolish, IMO. Cannot think of a reason to do this.
Maybe because the mountains are in the viewing area. Him saying massive is weird.This was foolish, IMO. Cannot think of a reason to do this.
Maybe because the mountains are in the viewing area. Him saying massive is weird.
I think this is his reasoning imoIt also gets eyes on the tv next week or maybe he sees something we don’t, with his experience I’m guessing he might have seen a system like this before and wants to get in front of it. JUST IN CASE.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Glenn, my guy, what are you doing?
I think this is his reasoning imo
Cause it's the long range NamNot liking how the 12k nam is looking for Tuesday. It doesn’t bring the cold air down for snow as fast as the gfs. This may be the more accurate scenario.
Got to love long range NAM... out of nowhere looking juicer and more timing friendly to tease you to look for trends
The column seems to support enough saturation for snow and actually shows a few inches.Careful with the NAM maps of simulated reflectivity. They can be quite deceptive. Doesn't mean any of that is reaching the ground, etc.