• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry More SE Snow ? (1/16-1/18)

SD said:
I would add watch the upper low near the US Canadian border. Each model that closes off the our upper system is farther north with this system and aren't flattening the ridge nearly as quickly.
Click to expand...

Yep, this is very key to allowing our s/w to cut-off and not surprisingly the GFS/NAM have been trending towards a stronger New England ridge
 
about the SREF: my 1.16 at Meridianville(closest) is only .10 qpf or 11 1/2 to 1. That is likely low, so the other sref amounts may be low too.
 
Stormlover said:
21z sref for Alabama Mean/averages
Muscle Shoals 1.36 inches
Meridianville 1.16 inches
Huntsville .95 of an inch
Ft. Payne .60 of an inch
Auburn .59 of an inch
Cullman .56 of an inch
Montgomery .47 of an inch
Anniston .42 of an inch
Alexander City .42 of an inch
Gadsden .32 of an inch
Dothan .12 of an inch
Click to expand...
Trending the wrong way if you are wanting snow in the 20/59 corridor.
 
My Sref plume here in Athens GA doubled from 15z. Up to. 47in from. 21in and my boom reading is almost at 3 in!

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
 
I dont know if this would have any effect on short range models, but the precipitation seems to be a couple of hours behind schedule from what they were predicting a few hours ago. It seems to be catching up in real time.looking a lot more promising over southern Ark. and Northrn LA. It seems to be moving a little more due east than NE. I feel better about ground truth than the models right now.
 
Webberweather53 said:
Here's a 500 hPa animation for that event using ERA-20C... There are some distinct differences between this upcoming event and January 1962, namely the s/w at the base of the trough was much further west when it entered the US and dug all the way down into Arizona and the entire longwave trough washed out during the course of the event, pretty classic overrunning setup in general, albeit it would be even more classic if the wave was embedded in the southern stream and came into the US thru California and ran into a big, cold vortex over SE Canada & the Great Lakes.

Jan-1962-US-500-hPa-animation.gif


View attachment 3027
Click to expand...
You know I would like that.

That 3 to 4 is looking pretty good now according to the SREF.
 
SD said:
I would add watch the upper low near the US Canadian border. Each model that closes off the our upper system is farther north with this system and aren't flattening the ridge nearly as quickly.
Click to expand...
great work! I Agree and something to watch
 
Webberweather53 said:
21z SREF for RDU after removing the one member w/ 10" lol. Important thing to note here if anything is that most of the members show anything between 1-4" but the mean definitely went up substantially. Again it is the SREF so take it w/ a grain of salt.
View attachment 3028
Click to expand...
Right! The only thing I use the SREF for is to predict what the NAM is going to output on the next run.
 
WeatherNC said:
It is, most of NC sees a 1-3" event on the 21z SREF, ARW is a little more amped as usual. Clicking through the stations the mean is not picking up on the gaps, some will see a dusting while others will see closer to 2-3". That's about the cap at this point, anyone who verifies more will be deemed fortunate.
Click to expand...

I'd be careful here. The SREF uses 10:1 SLRs and shows 0.28" QPF w/ a little less than 3" of snow in the Triad, in reality w/ 12-15:1 ratios, Greensboro would verbatim see 4-5"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top