HmmThis looks like one of those ads for those male enhancement pills.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
HmmThis looks like one of those ads for those male enhancement pills.
He's testing the limits of his lifetime membershipHmm
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Hope not but if we continue to trend that shortwave diving through the deep south farther S and stronger then we will see the tendency for models to show a westward solution again. Right now its almost acting slightly like a kicker which is part of the reason we saw the models (minus the GFS) jump east last night. There is just a lot of little nuance things within the pattern that will result in such a large track difference.Hopefully it won't .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
good pointsHope not but if we continue to trend that shortwave diving through the deep south farther S and stronger then we will see the tendency for models to show a westward solution again. Right now its almost acting slightly like a kicker which is part of the reason we saw the models (minus the GFS) jump east last night. There is just a lot of little nuance things within the pattern that will result in such a large track difference.
Most of those go right through my back yard in Chapin, SC.The new 12z tropical spaghetti plots are in
Sent from my SM-J700T1 using Tapatalk
Maybe gawx can help, or anyone else, but hurricanes love to get pulled or rugged near the islands when passing westward on the north side. New map coming soon
It looks to my eyes , to still be moving W , on satellite and radar, also looks like it's becoming asymmetrical on the W side a little bit?There's little question about the recent easterly trend of the models near the SE US. However, do others agree that she looks to be moving a bit south of the model consensus causing a higher threat for the eye to cross at least the NE portion of PR? I first noticed this last evening. Opinions? If so, is that inconsistent with the recent eastward trend of the models near the SE US or not?
No doubt. She is way south of the models. I think that Irma is just so strong of a storm that it is moving more west than NW. I feel that if she doesn't start moving more NW, Puerto Rico will get a severe hit from Irma, and possibly cause a major change in Irma's strength. This may get really bad if it doesn't move NW soon, and I feel something is up with the models. Not sure what, but as I said, I think that the strength is too much for the models to handle, so that may be the case.There's little question about the recent easterly trend of the models near the SE US. However, do others agree that she looks to be moving a bit south of the model consensus causing a higher threat for the eye to cross at least the NE portion of PR? I first noticed this last evening. Opinions? If so, is that inconsistent with the recent eastward trend of the models near the SE US or not?
I am interested in seeing if it does get closer to PR.There's little question about the recent easterly trend of the models near the SE US. However, do others agree that she looks to be moving a bit south of the model consensus causing a higher threat for the eye to cross at least the NE portion of PR? I first noticed this last evening. Opinions? If so, is that inconsistent with the recent eastward trend of the models near the SE US or not?
if west movement really dominates through the island, could that effect the track also? Something more of what the CMC was showing yesterday?No doubt. She is way south of the models. I think that Irma is just so strong of a storm that it is moving more west than NW. I feel that if she doesn't start moving more NW, Puerto Rico will get a severe hit from Irma, and possibly cause a major change in Irma's strength. This may get really bad if it doesn't move NW soon, and I feel something is up with the models. Not sure what, but as I said, I think that the strength is too much for the models to handle, so that may be the case.