That doesn't sound normal.Crazy to see winds at 11kts in the eye in the newest dropsonde
That doesn't sound normal.
This thing definitely may actually be going the way of the HMON, so let's see what recon finds the next few hours. The only thing for certain is that South Texas is going to be devastated by this, and I expect name retirement.
Pressurewise, no, but windwise, yes. 140 to 145 was what the HMON had, the HWRF was a weak cat 4.I don't think we get that far based on IR and structure, but a landfall intensity of 140mph is very reasonable.
Pressurewise, no, but windwise, yes. 140 to 145 was what the HMON had, the HWRF was a weak cat 4.
FS,Oh my. Look at what is above the surface, plus the surface?
If I am reading it correctly, the main chart is like a Skew T chart. It shows wind direction and temp and humidity. The table on the right is the drop info from the dropsonde. As it drops, it collects the data and reports it back. Once the drop hits the water, it stops reading. The lowest part on the table represents the surface, I believe. The highest represents the initial drop altitude. Anything in between is just the area before the surface. If you go back and read older ones form today, you will see those winds were higher or not yet strong enough. Now we are seeing a ramp up, and that was taken from the SE eyewall.FS,
You know I love weather, but some things I have not learned well (as all chorus "Obviously," which I hear all the way down here ... LOL), and reading a dropsonde graph is one of them ... can you give a 30 second tutorial on the graph?
Thanks!
Phil