• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Wintry Machine Learning Mauler 1/30-2/1

Are these increased ratios

How are you feeling about our neck of the woods as for the possibility of just getting some snow accumulation? It's tough being right on the edge.

As of now, I feel that SAV will most likely get either no or a trace of snow but favoring a trace. If we’re lucky, we could get a few tenths of an inch from a SE moving streamer that happens to center near us and doesn’t dry up too much on the way to the coast. Though unlikely based on our long history, that’s doable with how cold it looks to be if the very strong upper low verifies and so I’m excited about at least having that chance. Just getting a tenth of an inch or a couple of tenths is as you must know a big deal based on history as a strong majority of winters get no measurable wintry precip here.

This isn’t the very rare classic very moist storm setup like 2018 and 2025, which had cold enough air and lots of moisture in advance of the surface low. For our area, this one is much less moist and is mainly upper low generated.

If I get time, I’m going to look for similar mainly upper low generated analogs.
 
Last edited:
despite the poor start to nam for atlanta, it somehow recovers lol
Nam's wonky precip outputs aside, the 06z and 12z runs take the 850mb low much further south than the gfs through ga. same with the euro. we will see what the rest of the 12z runs show but the gfs is on it's own with it's much further north track.

1850.png
nam-218-all-georgia-total_snow_kuchera-9904000.png
 
Nam's wonky precip outputs aside, the 06z and 12z runs take the 850mb low much further south than the gfs through ga. same with the euro. we will see what the rest of the 12z runs show but the gfs is on it's own with it's much further north track.

View attachment 190547
View attachment 190544

It looks great in my area with a very rare 1.7-1.9” of snow, but it’s the terrible long range NAM and nothing else has anything like that. I’m heavily discounting this at this time.
 
Couple things on the NAM.
1. It's the long range NAM.
2. It looks like it has feedback issues even with the precip like it usually does even with the more progressive look.
3. It's the long range NAM
Glad to not be in the Nam bullseye this far out...never works out that way. Maybe by Friday at 12z different story
 
As of now, I feel that SAV will most likely get either no or a trace of snow but favoring a trace. If we’re lucky, we could get a few tenths of an inch from a SE moving streamer that happens to center near us and doesn’t dry up too much on the way to the coast. Though unlikely based on our long history, that’s doable with how cold it looks to be if the very strong upper low verifies and so I’m excited about at least having that chance. Just getting a tenth of an inch or a couple of tenths is as you must know a big deal based on history as a strong majority of winters get no measurable wintry precip here.

This isn’t the very rare classic very moist storm setup like 2018 and 2025, which had cold enough air and lots of moisture in advance of the surface low. For our area, this one is much less moist and is mainly upper low generated.

If I get time, I’m going to look for similar mainly upper low generated analogs.
Thanks for this! Last year was awesome and I appreciate you explaining how this setup differs. Much like you, it’s nice to be in the game and I would be more than happy with a dusting.
 
One thing we won’t have to worry about is soil temperatures! :) I’d imagine they will be even colder, perhaps fully below freezing by the time the system begins, too! Combined with the system starting at night and in super cold air temps and there will be basically zero melting except on treated asphalt surfaces! :)

IMG_0149.jpeg
 
It looks great in my area with a very rare 1.7-1.9” of snow, but it’s the terrible long range NAM and nothing else has anything like that. I’m heavily discounting this at this time.
Yep it's precip output at this range is almost 100% useless. But i don't think the nam is going to be alone in giving your local snow.
 
There is a decent chance atl gets 1 to 3 just based on the average of models. It won't take but 0.07 to get an inch with 15 to 1 ratios and 0.20 to get 3. In general models are showing that
I would not expect this at this point, despite what some of the other models have shown unless there's further corrections to the west in the next few days.

If you're along & west of the I-75 corridor in GA, I think there's a decent chance at seeing flakes, but in terms of accumulations, this is going to be more of an on/off snow showers sort of deal where the ground might get covered for a little, but then the sun comes out & melts it away.

As things go further to the east (Clayton-Athens N/S corridor), that's where the possible deform band could show up & get steady snow for a potential warning level criteria.
 
When the NAM and the SREF are disjointed, I almost always discount the NAM:

View attachment 190558
Looks like the SREF might’ve been trying to do a Murphy-to-Manteo (granted this is a smoothed mean). Precip is still ongoing and is spooling up in central / eastern NC.

1769613179890.png
 
Looks like the SREF might’ve been trying to do a Murphy-to-Manteo (granted this is a smoothed mean). Precip is still ongoing and is spooling up in central / eastern NC.

View attachment 190559
Almost every square inch of both carolinas on the mean. I think the last storm we could point to that did this was Christmas 2010.
 
Looks like the SREF might’ve been trying to do a Murphy-to-Manteo (granted this is a smoothed mean). Precip is still ongoing and is spooling up in central / eastern NC.

View attachment 190559
Still a lot less bullish than the globals but respectable. Looks like "the big one" for most of NC!
 
Oh Yeah!
prateptype-imp.conus.png
 
Back
Top