It can also move back east lol so for everyone saying it's going to come way west could be wrong
Hasn't moved east in 24 hours. Smart money on the west trend. Move to banter if this is not acceptable
It can also move back east lol so for everyone saying it's going to come way west could be wrong
Dang that's a pretty huge difference for only being around 45 miles awayI just checked them for Columbia SC and a few are getting moisture this way now. Also, looks good for Orangburg (south of Columbia). One has over .60 qpf down there.
I'm just stating that sometimes they will go back east, I have seen it plenty of timesHasn't moved east in 24 hours. Smart money on the west trend. Move to banter if this is not acceptable
Go to tropical tidbits, go find the 3 KM NAM, show the simulated radar/surface maps and watch what happens with the surface low. It literally bounces around like a monkey on crack. Not just small bounces either. Big ones through hour 60. The only reasoning I can think of is all that junk vorticity out there that i posted above.
The more I look at old charts from Jan 2000's carolina crusher, the more the 00z NAM looks like it. Hm. THe ETA missed the precip shield inland, but could that have been because the extra vorticity out in front was there (just not modeled well in 2000) that threw it off?
NAM closed it off also, but it looks like the RGEM would keep it closed longer!!
Great comparison Web. Great workThe similarities at 500 hpa between the NAM forecast and January 2000 are actually very scary...
0z January 25 2000 500 hPa vorticity, wind, and heights via ERA-20C
View attachment 2506
View attachment 2507