Wasn’t the first half of January suppose to be a torch ??? ? okay I’m sorry I had to say it
All the negative talking the past end of year has cursed us into being in this mess in the first place let’s hope we’re just correcting now ??Be careful what you say as you may curse it and cause the wx gods to give us a torch as punishment.
Before you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you have to actually be in the tunnel. The tunnel isn't even on the radar yet, according to the maps below. Going to be game over for most of January, if this comes to pass.
View attachment 29228
And it only gets worse from here.
View attachment 29229
Welcome back to our typical winter pattern. Maybe somebody can pick me up, but I'm not seeing much of a reason to expect much for most of the month now. Originally, I thought we'd start to shift better after week 2, but it looks like that estimate may be way too soon.
Before you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you have to actually be in the tunnel. The tunnel isn't even on the radar yet, according to the maps below. Going to be game over for most of January, if this comes to pass.
View attachment 29228
And it only gets worse from here.
View attachment 29229
Welcome back to our typical winter pattern. Maybe somebody can pick me up, but I'm not seeing much of a reason to expect much for most of the month now. Originally, I thought we'd start to shift better after week 2, but it looks like that estimate may be way too soon.
It's the GEFS so maybe it's wrong? But while the eps is slightly better @240, after that it goes in the tank through the end of the run, warning it's not prettyBefore you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you have to actually be in the tunnel. The tunnel isn't even on the radar yet, according to the maps below. Going to be game over for most of January, if this comes to pass.
View attachment 29228
And it only gets worse from here.
View attachment 29229
Welcome back to our typical winter pattern. Maybe somebody can pick me up, but I'm not seeing much of a reason to expect much for most of the month now. Originally, I thought we'd start to shift better after week 2, but it looks like that estimate may be way too soon.
It's the GEFS so maybe it's wrong? But while the eps is slightly better @240, after that it goes in the tank through the end of the run, warning it's not pretty
View attachment 29230
View attachment 29232
Before you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you have to actually be in the tunnel. The tunnel isn't even on the radar yet, according to the maps below. Going to be game over for most of January, if this comes to pass.
View attachment 29228
And it only gets worse from here.
View attachment 29229
Welcome back to our typical winter pattern. Maybe somebody can pick me up, but I'm not seeing much of a reason to expect much for most of the month now. Originally, I thought we'd start to shift better after week 2, but it looks like that estimate may be way too soon.
I wonder how skewed this member made that...There's a storm signal on the eps around D10 before things go off the cliff the rest of the month...
View attachment 29233
View attachment 29234
Unless I'm missing it I don't see individual eps panels on weathermodels sit... @KyloG @Ollie Williams anyone have individual panels? Thanks
Aww yes good 'ol @whatalife (sorry forgot lol) but thanks.![]()
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
![]()
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, I agree...if anyone were upset, I'd give the same advice. It's a little silly to get upset about weather, when there are much more important things in life. That said, there is a considerable amount of evidence that is suggesting a quite mild period, that has some durability, coming up. It's not just long range GEFS maps. There is quite a bit of broad support for it. If you use the 80/20 rule, there is a chance that all/most of the guidance is wrong, but I'd wager that's in the 20% camp, and not the 80%.It always consoles me to see that it is 10-15 day outlook on GFS? Considering the lack of consistency on it and all the models post 7 days, I think I would wait a few days to get too upset.
We're really good at phases 4-6 in the heart of winter.That has a phase 6 look all over it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who is whining? Let me know and the staff can address it.If the CFSv2’s tropical forcing forecasts are generally correct the next few weeks, this convectively coupled kelvin wave will enter the Indian Ocean this week and should return to the west-central Pacific around Jan 20th or so. I think this is somewhat reasonable given the fading IOD and background state we’re currently in which favors faster propagation thru the eastern hemisphere, even vs last month. If we are on this general path going forward, this warm up will probably extend from Jan 10-25, with renewed opportunities for cold returning thereafter and going into early February.
However, I don’t understand all the whining here this morning because we definitely have a legitimate window to see a winter storm ~ Jan 6-9 & some should be grateful we have a chance to begin with.
I think there is very good consensus that around the 10th on things look warm, but time to focus on the possible threat just before that happens.... let's real one inYeah, I agree...if anyone were upset, I'd give the same advice. It's a little silly to get upset about weather, when there are much more important things in life. That said, there is a considerable amount of evidence that is suggesting a quite mild period, that has some durability, coming up. It's not just long range GEFS maps. There is quite a bit of broad support for it. If you use the 80/20 rule, there is a chance that all/most of the guidance is wrong, but I'd wager that's in the 20% camp, and not the 80%.
Aww yes good 'ol @whatalife (sorry forgot lol) but thanks.
And I see a few systems but also one monster that kind of skews the mean, shoot if e13 happens it can torch the rest of winter for all I care Lol
Better than nothing I guess . It’s like getting blown out in football but you’re able to kick a FG late in the game to make it 48-3
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd feel a whole lot better about the chances if there were a high pressure up north somewhere (just looking at the Euro). Not ruling out the possibility by any means. It's not a wide window, but sometimes, when you only have a crack to work with, you have to take what you can get. Still, I feel a little better about this one than the one that didn't pan out in December. I'd probably rate this opportunity at about a 4.5 out of 10.I think there is very good consensus that around the 10th on things look warm, but time to focus on the possible threat just before that happens.... let's real one in
Who is whining? Let me know and the staff can address it.
I went back and read all of the posts from your 3:40ish AM post forward. I disagree with the term "whining". It doesn't seem like anyone is being too overly pessimistic or dramatic. Probably disappointment is more accurate. I will confess that I'm disappointed that we are likely going to blow a good portion of the heart of winter. Feels all too familiar. I know that's how it goes, though, and we can't change it. Personally, I'm still optimistic for February.There’s a collective feeling of agony/whining here because the pattern sucks after day 10. It sucks, but we have to play with the cards we’re being dealt. Hopefully we pick up storm in early January during our peak climo for cold so people ctfo.
Using 240+ maps from the terrible Gefs is the exact reason why this post is ridiculous ... we have a legit threat to watch in the medium range at around January 5-7 ... Let’s focus on that instead of using 240+ hour maps from the GEFS which we all know is garbanzo ... plus we see how the +PNA showed up all the sudden in the medium range once it got inside 240 hours and all models switched to that giving us our potential storm to track January 5-7Before you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you have to actually be in the tunnel. The tunnel isn't even on the radar yet, according to the maps below. Going to be game over for most of January, if this comes to pass.
View attachment 29228
And it only gets worse from here.
View attachment 29229
Welcome back to our typical winter pattern. Maybe somebody can pick me up, but I'm not seeing much of a reason to expect much for most of the month now. Originally, I thought we'd start to shift better after week 2, but it looks like that estimate may be way too soon.
It's the GEFS so maybe it's wrong? But while the eps is slightly better @240, after that it goes in the tank through the end of the run, warning it's not pretty
View attachment 29230
View attachment 29232
I respectfully disagree with a storm to track. I haven't seen one op run with a storm. And 2 or 3 decent hits out of 20 on the GEFS and less that 10 of 52 on the EPS is a very faint signal at the moment. As far as the pattern nothing has changed. A 2-3 day cold blast is not a pattern change.Using 240+ maps from the terrible Gefs is the exact reason why this post is ridiculous ... we have a legit threat to watch in the medium range at around January 5-7 ... Let’s focus on that instead of using 240+ hour maps from the GEFS which we all know is garbanzo ... plus we see how the +PNA showed up all the sudden in the medium range once it got inside 240 hours and all models switched to that giving us our potential storm to track January 5-7
Using 240+ maps from the terrible Gefs is the exact reason why this post is ridiculous ... we have a legit threat to watch in the medium range at around January 5-7 ... Let’s focus on that instead of using 240+ hour maps from the GEFS which we all know is garbanzo ... plus we see how the +PNA showed up all the sudden in the medium range once it got inside 240 hours and all models switched to that giving us our potential storm to track January 5-7
If you’ve tracked storms in past years you would know the threats 5-7 days out are very sneaky and although you don’t see operational support you look for ways a storm could possibly form both the Gfs and euro have the pieces on the table for something to happen January 5-7.. those type of threats can sneak up on us as we usually see our winter storms show up within the 5 day mark that’s why I think it’s at least a decent potential to watch ... yes a 2-3 day cold blast isn’t a pattern change I completely agree all I’m saying is that no model had been correct in the pattern in the long range and there is a lot of minute things that can change like ridging placement out west and end up giving us a much colder patternI respectfully disagree with a storm to track. I haven't seen one op run with a storm. And 2 or 3 decent hits out of 20 on the GEFS and less that 10 of 52 on the EPS is a very faint signal at the moment. As far as the pattern nothing has changed. A 2-3 day cold blast is not a pattern change.