I’m not buying the long range NAM. I’ve noticed a clear bias with it being too wet. As much as I want it to be right..
I’m not buying the long range NAM. I’ve noticed a clear bias with it being too wet. As much as I want it to be right..
Would that be snow in the upstate or is it to warmIt’s actually been to dry recently
Likely too warm but won’t know until the day before.Would that be snow in the upstate or is it to warm
Since the “upgrade” it’s been too dry.I’m not buying the long range NAM. I’ve noticed a clear bias with it being too wet. As much as I want it to be right..
If that were to verify, it looks like our area (RDU) would be good for wintery precip. At hour 84 surface temps would be ~34 with a dew point ~22. Surface winds would be from the due north, so no worries about warm air pushing in. 850 temps ~negative 4. At least this is something to finally track.... damn you 84 HOUR NAM .... DAMNNNNN YOUUUUUU FOR DRAGGING MY CHIPS IN
*i was going to put in whamby thread but seemed inappropriate with the other news sinking in*
GFS definitely trending to send that thing negative tilt sooner..View attachment 32187
Could Columbia possibly get in the game? At Day 4Obvious to see where this is going, soundings are noice just north of the precip sheild, supportive of snow, classic case of the north/northwest trend here with stronger energy/more digging View attachment 32189View attachment 32190View attachment 32191
Also this system moves in over night .. we love to see itWhat makes the run of the nam exciting was how temps were cooling during the event and 850s were cooling down a good bit along with the surface temps, NS energy phasing helps with that
Hour 81 (just west of CLT) View attachment 32183
hour 84
View attachment 32184We still have a long way, but this one has me a bit excited that I least see a few snowflakes fall in this dumpster fire winter