Shaggy
Member
Measured just over 2 inches at 8am with melting occuring.
Last edited:
I saw you got 5” earlier, is that the max accumulation you had up there? Looks like you’re in the jackpot zone, haven’t seen any totals higher than that yetI got co-workers over in Vance Co without power as well, reports of a few trees down in Warren County and my cousin posted a pic a few minutes ago of some small pines leaning in the roadway around here.
You’re absolutely right, but even the official NWS forecast was 2”, which didn’t happen here at least, and the forecast for the storm a couple weeks ago was 1-2” and we got zilch. Looks like Raleigh and areas east did better, though, I got fringed on the west side, it seems. Unusual. Always coming up with new ways to fail.Just never look at the wxbell 10:1 HRRR when HRRRv4 has built in variable snow SLR from 5:1 up to 17:1, and doesn’t translate mixed/sleet to snow. Not that you did, but I think the HRRR product in particular from wxbell got hopes up...
Coverage here isn’t as good as I hoped for . Still got areas of grass not covered . Melting is definitely happening .
Yeah, that’s what sucks about these rain to snow above freezing storms. The wet areas either never get covered or melt really quickly since the water never freezes since it’s above freezing. Also always hear lots of running water in the gutters while the snow falls since there’s continuous melting going on everywhere, which is unfortunate.Coverage here isn’t as good as I hoped for . Still got areas of grass not covered . Melting is definitely happening .
@metwannabe is always in the jackpot zone these days. Fab Feb 2020, he was, too. ?I saw you got 5” earlier, is that the max accumulation you had up there? Looks like you’re in the jackpot zone, haven’t seen any totals higher than that yet
Is that a pig wearing a dress ?
Most definitely. I was the first to pick up on this and the new version seemed the most consistent. As far as overblown totals go thats a product of the limitations in the algorithms used to convert QPF into snow totals not the actual model itself.So do we count this as a win for the GFS? The totals might have been overblown but it seems to have been the model that was the most consistent showing this storm and a lot of the other models caved to it.
GFS showed the storm before others and consistently, if people believe 10:1 snow maps thats on them but the storm did happen. Rates probably about 5:1 to 7:1So do we count this as a win for the GFS? The totals might have been overblown but it seems to have been the model that was the most consistent showing this storm and a lot of the other models caved to it.
Yeah if we had cold air awaiting the storm, much better results.2-3" not bad but could have been better....need real cold....not just barely good enough cold.....