Stormlover
Member
I'm taking my chances here 10/10 times and if it doesn't work then sucks for me
Yeah wouldn’t take much for that to be awesome
It feels like it's harder than it should be to match up the precip with the cold anymore.
Yeah, why i don't like the very cold air. Seems we do better with snow when we're right on that line with it being cold or not cold enough.It's always a risk with arctic air. The last two years we had our snow totals way reduced by it
1989 and 1977 were dry other than the coastal areas
Yeah, why i don't like the very cold air. Seems we do better with snow when we're right on that line with it being cold or not cold enough.
I've heard for years get the cold in first but all that's ever give me is cold and dry. Give me a banana high that I can tap into and I'll take my chances all day long. It's always threading the needle. That's an understatement.
The 2 biggest snows I've seen in Georgia were in December and March. Seems like the heart of winter is less likely to have a big snowstorm.Yeah I mean I know Tulsas biggest snowstorm on record came after a heat wave.... I know the biggest snowstorm in Dallas was with temps at 33-34 degrees... In Alabama it was in Mid March!
I'm noticing a trend here
With big arctic shots you have to correctly time a wave -- as the cold press is inbound or outbound or temporarily oscillating around the area. The exception to this is with an active STJ, which we don't have now.
The advantage we *appear* to have is a long period of cold to very cold and also a very well-placed ridge/block in the NAO space. This can slow the flow and allow more room for amplification of a wave or more time for two waves to interact or potentially phase. It's why a properly configured -NAO is so important for us.
In many of our cold and dry arctic outbreaks, we're missing something. Care to guess what that is? If you said a properly placed, strong -NAO, you'd be correct.
We're absolutely going to see some bangers show up at some point. Just wait for it.
Yeah, why i don't like the very cold air. Seems we do better with snow when we're right on that line with it being cold or not cold enough.
With big arctic shots you have to correctly time a wave -- as the cold press is inbound or outbound or temporarily oscillating around the area. The exception to this is with an active STJ, which we don't have now.
The advantage we *appear* to have is a long period of cold to very cold and also a very well-placed ridge/block in the NAO space. This can slow the flow and allow more room for amplification of a wave or more time for two waves to interact or potentially phase. It's why a properly configured -NAO is so important for us.
In many of our cold and dry arctic outbreaks, we're missing something. Care to guess what that is? If you said a properly placed, strong -NAO, you'd be correct.
We're absolutely going to see some bangers show up at some point. Just wait for it.
Almost as difficult as moderating this forum.What a nightmare to forecast lol View attachment 157807
From the cursory glance it just looks like the system adjusted north but has slowed down some. In other words the track has adjusted/set but speed/timing still in fluxWhat a nightmare to forecast lol View attachment 157807
All that's needed is a little more energy rotating around the western periphery of the vortex during the period below to suppress the height field some. That in tandem with the continued further south trend of entry point into the western U.S. would do the trick. The surface low would then track along the Arctic front to the south near the Gulf at that point. It's one reason I've highlighted this period all along combined with the -NAO in place.What a nightmare to forecast lol View attachment 157807
when all of your energy is coming from the northern stream it’s tough to get that high pressure to slide in place to the east and dam up beside that 50/50 low. It’s just a jumbled up mess of energy dropping in off the northern stream.. the tough part is that’s what’s bringing the cold down but it’s also what’s making it difficult. Double edged sword. We really need something to dive in and dig not just to our west but to our south and west. (Or getting some separation between waves could work) But with what we’re seeing modeled the odds are still very high for us relative to what we’ve seen over the last several yearsWith big arctic shots you have to correctly time a wave -- as the cold press is inbound or outbound or temporarily oscillating around the area. The exception to this is with an active STJ, which we don't have now.
The advantage we *appear* to have is a long period of cold to very cold and also a very well-placed ridge/block in the NAO space. This can slow the flow and allow more room for amplification of a wave or more time for two waves to interact or potentially phase. It's why a properly configured -NAO is so important for us.
In many of our cold and dry arctic outbreaks, we're missing something. Care to guess what that is? If you said a properly placed, strong -NAO, you'd be correct.
We're absolutely going to see some bangers show up at some point. Just wait for it.
There's plenty of time for that to occur but seemingly it has adjusted north now?All that's needed is a little more energy rotating around the western periphery of the vortex during the period below to suppress the height field some. That in tandem with the continued further south trend of entry point into the western U.S. would do the trick. The surface low would then track along the Arctic front to the south near the Gulf at that point. It's one reason I've highlighted this period all along combined with the -NAO in place.
View attachment 157808
It did trend back a little south with the last run.There's plenty of time for that to occur but seemingly it has adjusted north now?
There's plenty of time for that to occur but seemingly it has adjusted north now?
Definitely has on the Euro and GFS. It's certainly far from a guarantee or even a likely but it's not worth giving up on at this range either IMO.There's plenty of time for that to occur but seemingly it has adjusted north now?
Got Raleigh attention in AFD ..
"Late Sunday night though Monday a deep trough will move through the
region, bringing the next chance for precipitation. It is currently
unclear how much/if any of the precipitation will be frozen as
models differ in timing and temperatures. However, this appears to
follow a Miller B type pattern, which can be conducive to frozen p-
types in our northern counties, so a chance of freezing rain and snow
were introduced mainly from 6-12Z early Monday morning, but as
models come to better agreement this is likely to change. Any frozen
precipitation that does fall is likely to be very short lived"