Avalanche
Member
Inside 48....Is this model reliable?
Inside 48....Is this model reliable?
A lot of good things start at 69The NAM was spot on for the 12/8/17 storm and nobody wanted to give it credit. I said all this earlier, it can get it right sometimes. Hell, the good stuff started at 69. Niiiiceee
View attachment 100103
3km headed for some goods
Better hope something drastically changes after this look . Of course the 3k sucks but this H5 look isn't what our area needs or wants
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why’s that? What would happened? Make the low go north some??Better hope something drastically changes after this look . Of course the 3k sucks but this H5 look isn't what our area needs or wants
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The 3k NAM looks almost exactly the same as the 12k. Would likely deepen the wave the same way, and boost precip over AL.Why’s that? What would happened? Make the low go north some??
The 3k NAM looks almost exactly the same as the 12k. Would likely deepen the wave the same way, and boost precip over AL.
The 3k NAM looks almost exactly the same as the 12k. Would likely deepen the wave the same way, and boost precip over AL.
Compared to 32/12km NAM models from the same time frame.Better hope something drastically changes after this look . Of course the 3k sucks but this H5 look isn't what our area needs or wants
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If this went on further you would get 2-4 hours of some back side light snow in NE NC as temps are in the mid 30’s and the upper air is right at or below freezing.View attachment 100110The RGEM is probably closer to what we see