Tsappfrog20
Member
Year 2 of the South trend continues.
View attachment 167907
Still probably too far north to get central North Carolina in the game, but one can hope
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Year 2 of the South trend continues.
View attachment 167907
Still probably too far north to get central North Carolina in the game, but one can hope
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not gonna let the ICON or south trends on the GFS/GEFS suck me back in. I'd all but give up on this and that's still where I'm at with it
I assume the 850s are even cruddier?Only if we could do this until verification right ? View attachment 167913
We will follow Boston’s lead!Only if we could do this until verification right ? View attachment 167913
no, you can see them trending back in CAD areas on Fro MapI assume the 850s are even cruddier?
Only if we could do this until verification right ? View attachment 167913
I highly doubt we trend back to snow but I still would watch out for ZR around I-40/the foothills and escarpment. Certainly could go back that direction
Verbatim, on the Euro 2m temps are in the mid to upper 30s in those areas. Historically, I want to say the Euro tends to be too warm at the surface in CAD situations, though (this has certainly been the case in past storms, like the March 2014 ice storm in the Triad when it was awful, but I’m not sure if it’s true these days or not). I’d certainly expect colder with those 925 temps.Wait, so if 925s get to below freezing around clt this run, I would guess the surface is colder. Does Euro show an ice storm in the piedmont now?
I know how folks feel about this model after it’s rug pull, but it’s in a better timeframe and is following current trends on other OPs/ENS, but the AI does have a stronger wedge this run with a ice event for the NW Piedmont/parts of the triad/foothills and escarpment
Trying not to get sucked in but these trends back south again are pretty stark attmI know how folks feel about this model after it’s rug pull, but it’s in a better timeframe and is following current trends on other OPs/ENS, but the AI does have a stronger wedge this run with a ice event for the NW Piedmont/parts of the triad/foothills and escarpment
I knew Avery county wouldn’t get skipped. This is their bread and butter patternAI giving foothills some love...little tick south past 24-36 hours...
View attachment 167936View attachment 167938
AI giving foothills some love...little tick south past 24-36 hours...
View attachment 167936View attachment 167938
From my understanding is he calculates the upper level and surface temperatures to detect ice sleet snow. It's what the AIFS should already offer, but yet again, this "amazing model from the future" has maps from 1983.
Someone may have posted this already, but Tomer Burg created on his site estimated precip types to go with the AI model. Pretty neat.
It is an insane amount of waves in just a few days. Dare I say there’s more chances for model error in such a situation? (For better or for worse)?
I mean geez.... is it too much to ask for one of 6 storms to trend a little south?It is an insane amount of waves in just a few days. Dare I say there’s more chances for model error in such a situation? (For better or for worse)?
You think that this could work for at least a thump in Blacksburg-Roanoke? I’m unsure at this point.We always trend to these close calls but seemingly stay stuck at 33 and above outside climo favored areas. Maybe we can do something different for once. But trend is your friend on this particular model for wintry View attachment 167932View attachment 167937View attachment 167930
Ice storm I would think. All the way down the I 81 corridor to about Abingdon.You think that this could work for at least a thump in Blacksburg-Roanoke? I’m unsure at this point.