• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Pattern February 11-13 2025

Yes, you can have frost on the grass at night with high soil temps. You can have snow on the grass after a few minutes of heavy rates. However, roads and bare ground is a different story. These areas will be the last to cave.
True though I will say the storm I mentioned did have snow sticking to the roads after about an hour, but obviously it melted as soon as the rates dropped
 
Look I personally watched 2.5” pile up in 2 hours on 4/2/2019 during the day. This was with an early April sun angle and following a couple weeks of temperatures in the 60s and 70s. Yes soil temperatures do mean something but heavy rates do overcome that.

As you stated heavy rates can overcome this so rates are very important. 0.5” QPF in two hours is going to net you a lot more accumulation than 0.5” over 6 hours in these situations. Also, I bet the roads if they got covered melted quickly with that one.
 
No way that would happen. Soil and ground temperatures are around 58 this afternoon in your area. Check the Econet stations. You are in good shape.
Can’t always go by stations for accurate ground temperatures. Have to check yourself for accuracy with temp probe
 
Cherry picking a model right now, but here's the 0z HRW-WRT-NSSL for the last frame(hour 48):

1739188504822.png


1739188657420.png
Freezing rain up to hour 48:
1739188733504.png

This would go along with what RAH mentioned, whereas this is the low possibility option:

Confidence is increasing that a brief initial `burst` of sleet Tues
morning will quickly transition to an all liquid forecast as the
warm nose rapidly strengthens and surface wetbulb temperatures
delineating the southern/eastern extent of freezing rain. Confidence
remains medium-low on where this will set up, but gradual warming
and lifting northward of the freezing surface wetbulb is expected
through the afternoon into southern VA. Continuing to advertise the
I-85 corridor as its initial starting point with the early morning
update. Some guidance suggest with nocturnal cooling and continued
northerly surface flow that the wetbulb freezing line may ooze back
south towards the I-85 corridor Tues night into Wed morning and
result in additional ice accrual, but confidence is low in this
scenario. Tues night into Wed morning will need to be watched
closely as model guidance is suggesting a slow moving band of
precipitation developing as low-level FGEN sags back into our area
and may result in higher ice accumulation than currently advertised.

Alternatively, central NC counties may remain just above freezing
Tues night into Wed and result in nothing more than a cold rain.
 
View attachment 168161
NWS Blacksburg newest update:
More confident on widespread icing, more confident on Blacksburg getting a solid thump and less confident about Roanoke getting that same thump (shocker).
Looks like a guaranteed COLD rain for Big Frosty!
 
Hey, I mean as long as Lynchburg and Richmond score again thats all that matters we know how starved central VA and up has been ....(Rolls eyes)
happy to be in the game again but it would be cool if we could break past the 4 inch barrier. don't feel great about this... feels sleety
 
View attachment 168161
NWS Blacksburg newest update:
More confident on widespread icing, more confident on Blacksburg getting a solid thump and less confident about Roanoke getting that same thump (shocker).
If we do get cold enough for ZR, I am worried about the duration of the wedge. They can be stubborn to break down here in the valley and some models show it holding into early Thursday. I'd like to see that fronto band a little farther south just like everyone else on here :) Some of those local in house models are still a bit south.
 
Hopefully here in Roanoke, we will get more sleet than freezing rain after the changeover. That's what usually happens here during these kind of setups.
1739199977706.png
You should be right in this case with how the NAM is depicting where the warm nose is located. Still very cold around 850 after the warming.
 
Alright so heres my thoughts on this event, especially with early on in the system with ptypes and where the snow shield sets up. I draw a lot of comparisons to the 1/5 system to this one. The 1/5 system was a much stronger wave overall and CAD was a bit stronger with that one. Still similar processes involved here. Something a lot of people maybe remember is how the NAM tried to depict the snow shield in that last system and how far north developed it leaving southern and SW VA with a little snow but mostly getting missed out on the precipitation. While the times here are not exactly the same you can see how wrong it was.1739200738112.png1739200812978.png
While the NAM is great at sensing warm noses, its overestimation of WAA sends the precip too far north in most setups. I'm not doubting that the DC area is going to get a good snowstorm but the 10+ totals are laughable in my opinion because it sends the precip too far north for too long. Now that I have got this explanation out of the way I can talk about this system. Most modeling is not like the NAM as simple as that, and sets up the snow shield and solid banding starting south of Roanoke area.1739201186174.png1739201239142.png
1739201269186.png
1739201361590.png
(I will note the HRRR is too far south here which is typical as it normally runs cold) Overall you can see the NAM is out to lunch with this and for the reasons I stated above it will be wrong again on where this inital front end thump sets up. I think the oddest thing about the NAMs depiction is how the 850 mb frontogensis is setup in a way that would make you think the snow shield would be further south but its not. Compared to the RGEM which in my opinion does really well at figuring out banding, (been my go to for years now in this case) its similar to the RGEM so why are they not the same???1739201665406.png1739201691389.png
Anyways thats all I got for my analysis of this event, NAM will overestimate WAA and push the best banding north and will be wrong just like it was in the 1/5 system. Look I'm ready to eat my words here because meteorology is an extremely complicated science, but I'm confident my thoughts here will be close to what happens. I'm thinking a solid 3-5 inches in the Blacksburg and Roanoke area before a switch to sleet/frz rain. Edit here: not sure why the images are messed with the typing, my edit screen shows it in the correct way
 
Alright so heres my thoughts on this event, especially with early on in the system with ptypes and where the snow shield sets up. I draw a lot of comparisons to the 1/5 system to this one. The 1/5 system was a much stronger wave overall and CAD was a bit stronger with that one. Still similar processes involved here. Something a lot of people maybe remember is how the NAM tried to depict the snow shield in that last system and how far north developed it leaving southern and SW VA with a little snow but mostly getting missed out on the precipitation. While the times here are not exactly the same you can see how wrong it was.View attachment 168165View attachment 168166
While the NAM is great at sensing warm noses, its overestimation of WAA sends the precip too far north in most setups. I'm not doubting that the DC area is going to get a good snowstorm but the 10+ totals are laughable in my opinion because it sends the precip too far north for too long. Now that I have got this explanation out of the way I can talk about this system. Most modeling is not like the NAM as simple as that, and sets up the snow shield and solid banding starting south of Roanoke area.View attachment 168167View attachment 168168
View attachment 168169
View attachment 168171
(I will note the HRRR is too far south here which is typical as it normally runs cold) Overall you can see the NAM is out to lunch with this and for the reasons I stated above it will be wrong again on where this inital front end thump sets up. I think the oddest thing about the NAMs depiction is how the 850 mb frontogensis is setup in a way that would make you think the snow shield would be further south but its not. Compared to the RGEM which in my opinion does really well at figuring out banding, (been my go to for years now in this case) its similar to the RGEM so why are they not the same???View attachment 168172View attachment 168173
Anyways thats all I got for my analysis of this event, NAM will overestimate WAA and push the best banding north and will be wrong just like it was in the 1/5 system. Look I'm ready to eat my words here because meteorology is an extremely complicated science, but I'm confident my thoughts here will be close to what happens. I'm thinking a solid 3-5 inches in the Blacksburg and Roanoke area before a switch to sleet/frz rain. Edit here: not sure why the images are messed with the typing, my edit screen shows it in the correct way
not to just piggyback on this diligently researched post but this is pretty much what i think, although i think i'm a little more concerned with the warm nose than you are
 
not to just piggyback on this diligently researched post but this is pretty much what i think, although i think i'm a little more concerned with the warm nose than you are
I'm worried about the warm nose forsure but yeah my thoughts above about the NAM and its crapiness is that its not close to other modeling. Hope I don't eat my words!!!
 
There is a chance if the over running comes in quicker for central NC, before mid morning Tuesday we could see a little frozen. Small, very small chance.

View attachment 168193
More times than not it does come in quicker than modeled, let's see if we can squeeze out a few flakes/pellets
 
Up here in Wytheville looking like a good 2 to 4 inches before a changeover to freezing rain. Freezing rain is my concern with some models spitting out a inch of ice. The official forecast is for .25 to .50 ice. Nasty dangerous travel Tuesday am to Wednesday midday.
 
Back
Top