Y'all failed....Y'all bring home the rest of the suite, let's real in an early Christmas miracle
View attachment 156029
Y'all failed....Y'all bring home the rest of the suite, let's real in an early Christmas miracle
View attachment 156029
Wonder how we can ---- this up. Starting to see the western ridging return near end of ensembles now. Just not enthused for snow chances until we get a storm within 72-96 hours. Tough couple years…
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Doesn't shortening wavelengths usually occur beginning of winter or end of winter, or am I way off kilter? LolThe general stage is being set for some sort of severe weather outbreak over the southern-eastern us after Christmas.
Big pacific jet extension then a collapse and a transition into a colder pattern in early January will require shortening wavelengths and strong cyclones/troughs to use up the background westerly momentum.
Probably will get at least one big storm system that occludes up into the lakes or so and sets the table for the Hudson Bay vortex again.
We’re pretty mild beforehand, won’t have much of an issue getting good instability pretty far to the north for this time of year too
whewThis one is coming back for the NE. They get there NW trend unlike us View attachment 156048
Yeah even we had a few decent members on 6z. Good news is timeframe is within all EPS runs at this point.whew
couldn't draw up a better trend
also, we're at a spot where even ticks better at 5h will have an outsized impact at the surface bc of the little feedbacks that occur with the baroclinicity off the coast. excited for the 12z.
don't think this is a storm for most, i will be leveraging my geographic advantage with this storm, but still a good amount of time left
Yep. I heavily debated trying to talk my family into staying in BOS another week and would have if it were only a few extra days and not like 7. This isn't far off from a big deal for them.This one is coming back for the NE. They get there NW trend unlike us View attachment 156048
The 540 line barely reaches Chicago.
The 540 line is the least of our problems. It also has very little utility in precip type forecasting around here.The 540 line barely reaches Chicago.
P.S. In the map I was showing, that was geopotential height not thickness. The 540 thickness line valid at the same time is across western NC and yet we still are far too warm to snow in the low levels, just further proving my point that the 540dm thickness line is not very useful in precip type forecasting (it looks at the entire 1000-500 mb layer thickness) whereas we often struggle with either low level temperatures and/or small warm noses in the 850-700 mb levels which is why the 1000-850 (hello my username) and 850-700 mb partial thickness evaluation is more useful.The 540 line is the least of our problems. It also has very little utility in precip type forecasting around here.