Wiki?
If you mean linking to the blog from wiki, good idea, Phil.
Wiki?
I'm not giving up yet with the wrap around precip. with the late week system. Reasons: 1.) The timing of the wrap around precip. is still over 100 hrs out. 2.) Evidence of colder surface temps. (on previous runs) can trend colder again on future model runs. 3.) Dynamic cooling is very possible.
Something shouldn't be counted off when there has been evidence of something occuring. Also, the storm system hasn't even developed yet. It's not even in the full 84 hr time frame to confirm what the GFS, Euro, FV3, etc. has been showing. By then, there could be some changes, big or small. You never know, there could be hefty wrap around snow showing up on the models within the next 48 hrs.
Your blog is there; it's the new stuff you just added (at least I think it's new stuff - #'s 1- 7) that would make an exceptional addition ... I can copy and insert your text and links into Wiki, or you can send FS or me some text with the links, if you want ... or better yet, add it to your blog!If you mean linking to the blog from wiki, good idea, Phil.
Your blog is there; it's the new stuff you just added (at least I think it's new stuff - #'s 1- 7) that would make an exceptional addition ... I can copy and insert your text and links into Wiki, or you can send FS or some text withe the links, if you want ... or better yet, add it to your blog!
OK and good to know ... but I'm always looking for new, good, stuff to add to our Wiki!None of it is new. I retrieved all of that from looking back at the blog post, especially the diagram with average anomalies for each phase both inside and out.
I agree with you that's why I'm not giving up on it as well... This is the third day in a row the models been consistently showing something from the 20-23 timeframe...I'm not giving up yet with the wrap around precip. with the late week system. Reasons: 1.) The timing of the wrap around precip. is still over 100 hrs out. 2.) Evidence of colder surface temps. (on previous runs) can trend colder again on future model runs. 3.) Dynamic cooling is very possible.
Something shouldn't be counted off when there has been evidence of something occuring. Also, the storm system hasn't even developed yet. It's not even in the full 84 hr time frame to confirm what the GFS, Euro, FV3, etc. has been showing. By then, there could be some changes, big or small. You never know, there could be hefty wrap around snow showing up on the models within the next 48 hrs.
Yeah sucks we have a two contour closed low and surface temps to that 900mb level sucks.Quite annoying. For the second time in two weeks if we had cold air at the 900mb level and below, portions of the south would see a very nice hit with that.
Dude chill out, I didn't read all the comments if that were mention before. Im sorry for askingfor the thousandth time... this should be pinned.. its tropical tidbits problem not FV3...
EDIT: PICS 12z PIVOTAL VS TIBITS
thats why i said it should be pinned because somehow people miss it and its been asked and explained multiple times..........Dude chill out, I didn't read all the comments if that were mention before. Im sorry for asking
It's all good man, just been real busy lately lol. Didn't mean to sound rudethats why i said it should be pinned because somehow people miss it and its been asked and explained multiple times..........
I found this website (link below) that lists accumulating snowfalls in ATL that dates back to the 1930s. There are some accumulating snowfalls in there in the month of Dec. but most of them are a trace. I would have to do some more digging to view the maps to see the setup. Some maps are hard to find though.I'd like to know the percentage of the time over the last 70 years (when historical upper atmospheric maps started) in Dec that a two contour low didn't produce sig snow in the SE. I don't have the time to research that and it would be very time consuming. But if someone had an enormous amount of time, they could look at the daily wx maps for every Dec day back 70 years, find the days with the two contour lows, and then looked at the daily wx conditions for key cities nearby. Or if they didn't have that much time, maybe they could look back, say, only 25 years or whatever.
I do already know that the number of major snows at ATL from a pure upper low without an accompanying Gulf low moving well to the south is very low with 3/1/2009 being one of the very few exceptions. Almost all major ATL snows were associated with Gulf surface lows, often weak, whether or not there was an accompanying closed upper low. 3/1993 was a very rare very strong Gulf low, by far the strongest on record to produce major ATl snow.
im sorry if i sounded rude as well i just got tired of reading the fv3 maps are horrible lolIt's all good man, just been real busy lately lol. Didn't mean to sound rude
I found this website (link below) that lists accumulating snowfalls in ATL that dates back to the 1930s. There are some accumulating snowfalls in there in the month of Dec. but most of them are a trace. I would have to do some more digging to view the maps to see the setup. Some maps are hard to find though.
https://www.currentresults.com/Yearly-Weather/USA/GA/Atlanta/extreme-annual-atlanta-snowfall.php
These?From what I know, meteocentre (where I get the UKMET) has retrospective maps, but I don't know how to find them off the top of my head. Used it to look at a couple previous storms.
I found this website (link below) that lists accumulating snowfalls in ATL that dates back to the 1930s. There are some accumulating snowfalls in there in the month of Dec. but most of them are a trace. I would have to do some more digging to view the maps to see the setup. Some maps are hard to find though.
https://www.currentresults.com/Yearly-Weather/USA/GA/Atlanta/extreme-annual-atlanta-snowfall.php