Just need to get more seperation and we’re goodThe two waves didn't phase this run, but too much interaction, and wastes some of the moisture.
View attachment 55722
Just need to get more seperation and we’re goodThe two waves didn't phase this run, but too much interaction, and wastes some of the moisture.
View attachment 55722
Yeah, looks like a sounding that would result in 32-33F realistically at the surface, assuming decent rates. Not ideal for accumulation, but workable.That’s easily a heavy wet snow sounding as the important 925/850/700mb layers are below freezing, that’s straight up wet snow soundings there tho, and some lift There in the DGZ
Sir the note below your name says rates will overcome allYeah, looks like a sounding that would result in 32-33F realistically at the surface, assuming decent rates. Not ideal for accumulation, but workable.
We've seen much worse than this temperature profile -- it's really just the surface layer we need to worry about. Wouldn't be surprised if this system overperformed under the ULL.
View attachment 55719
View attachment 55718
View attachment 55720
What about Pickens county scEven in the upstate the boundary layer is about as thin as you can get. Spartanburg is below freezing at the 850’s and 33 degrees at the 925. You get any form of slightly moderate rates and you will have snowfall. Also remember that temperatures will be crashing quickly as the day goes on and it’s just a matter of making sure the moisture is going to be around.
In all honesty I don’t get too concerned with surface temperatures 32-33 degrees for a daytime snowfall in December and early January. The sun angle is at its lowest of the year now. Just today I was outside in the middle of the afternoon and with full overcast and little drizzle falling, it almost had an evening twilight look.Yeah, looks like a sounding that would result in 32-33F realistically at the surface, assuming decent rates. Not ideal for accumulation, but workable.
Yup! I did trend in the right direction, but not enough to really get my attention.Yo @Ollie Williams i know the EPS will still probably suck but did it improve at H5 with less interaction with that first N/S piece
Good or badThe southern wave on the NAM so far looks faster than 18z through 39 hours. Although, slower than 12z.
badGood or bad
What about Pickens county sc