Yes. More data the models will start coming together on a closer solution.I am sure this could change things either way correct?
Yes. More data the models will start coming together on a closer solution.I am sure this could change things either way correct?
Well if it's showing that and potentially underestimating the CAD, and since it's trending more towards a colder CAD setup, we should see that line come further south.Getting closer in Atlanta
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks for your explanation. My feeling is that you base everything on the GFS and I don't trust ANY global model to make a flat statement like you made even though it is possible based of your reasoning. However, until the NAM and RGEM get into range I won't agree that it will go farther west than the Triad area. That is fine though, everyone including me make some flat statements that end up proven wrong.
I'm glad I'm reading a weather forum and know what you are talking about....Does the backside make it in here, Kylo?
Great. Of course.The backside rain gets us heavy. The 850 line just stays in Chatham county the whole time...pain.
View attachment 8488
View attachment 8487
Wow!! This run put Northern Midlands of SC back in the picture possibly.For Raleigh, it's about 0.5" QPF of front end sleet/snow then 1.5" of very cold rain. But triad and mountains get crushed with backside too.
View attachment 8486
You think you would have a snowier look further south with the low being further south.
The backside is always very tricky.I'm glad I'm reading a weather forum and know what you are talking about....