• Hello, please take a minute to check out our awesome content, contributed by the wonderful members of our community. We hope you'll add your own thoughts and opinions by making a free account!

Coronavirus (Stay on Topic)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sometimes you need to just look at Twitter posts and know they are --------. I would like to say I'm surprised 14k people retweeted this, but I'm not.

The problem is people think because a verified twitter account tweets something, it must be true. Hence the following and retweets. There’s no evidence that even occurred and she doesn’t need any. The internet is great.
 
My PaReNtS fRiEnDs

Well I know plenty of people who got calls saying they were negative, so her point?
Taking advantage of having a huge follower base to spread lies to make Covid seem like a joke. Just check her profile and see what her views seem to lean toward. If I had a twitter account with thousands of followers and said the same thing people would react just the same. As I say, to some people, everything is a conspiracy. Some people need to get their heads out of the clouds and think for themselves, not listen to some weird random person on the internet.
 
Another pre-print study showing HCQ and zinc dropping deaths and significantly reducing hospitalizations.

The demonization of HCQ by the media and some of the journals to spite Trump is bad enough and demands ridicule, but if this does end up proving beneficial it should be criminal.

Thats just a huge conspiracy theory. The war against trump and his HCQ cure.

Plenty of countries outside of Trump’s America has had plenty of time to show benefit of HCQ and they can’t, but somehow that’s also against trump? If it was a miracle drug it would have been proven by now, really, it’s not hard especially with the amount of hospitalizations at the moment and the wide availability of the drug even outside of the USA. I have patients going without it because of a shortage and the fact that the USA has a national stockpile of 63 million doses just sitting in a warehouse.

I want my lupus patients to have HCQ again.
I want my rheumatoid arthritis patients to have HCQ again.
I am tired of the polarity in politics involving an actual medication that’s used to treat actual disease every day, outside of Coronavirus.

It’s time to believe the experts here. Even if it shows an extremely small benefit, it isn’t a win by Trump. HCQ has notable risks.... In healthcare we do something called risk-benefit analysis. If the risks outweigh the small benefit, especially when used in a critical patient, doctors opt to use better options. It’s not as simple as “it can help so give it”. I haven’t read the pre-print but look forward to the critiques and let’s see if it proves anything we don’t already know here. There’s a million drugs that are showing some benefit in protecting patients, such as ARBs and H2 antagonists, the fact that HCQ is still being discussed is strictly political. I look forward to see the trial when it’s published!
 
Thats just a huge conspiracy theory. The war against trump and his HCQ cure.

Plenty of countries outside of Trump’s America has had plenty of time to show benefit of HCQ and they can’t, but somehow that’s also against trump? If it was a miracle drug it would have been proven by now, really, it’s not hard especially with the amount of hospitalizations at the moment and the wide availability of the drug even outside of the USA. I have patients going without it because of a shortage and the fact that the USA has a national stockpile of 63 million doses just sitting in a warehouse.

I want my lupus patients to have HCQ again.
I want my rheumatoid arthritis patients to have HCQ again.
I am tired of the polarity in politics involving an actual medication that’s used to treat actual disease every day, outside of Coronavirus.

It’s time to believe the experts here. Even if it shows an extremely small benefit, it isn’t a win by Trump. HCQ has notable risks.... In healthcare we do something called risk-benefit analysis. If the risks outweigh the small benefit, especially when used in a critical patient, doctors opt to use better options. It’s not as simple as “it can help so give it”. I haven’t read the pre-print but look forward to the critiques and let’s see if it proves anything we don’t already know here. There’s a million drugs that are showing some benefit in protecting patients, such as ARBs and H2 antagonists, the fact that HCQ is still being discussed is strictly political. I look forward to see the trial when it’s published!

Sorry, I can't agree it wasn't a snipe against Trump. I agree HCQ may provide no benefit, but when the Lancet sides against Trump and then publishes that piece of crap study that has not only been ridiculed for horrible data and then has to be retracted along with the New England medical journal, it's political. One of the original authors of the study even "resigned" from his job after it was brought to light. Don't forget how the media quickly reported that HCQ and Trump was killing people spread like wildfire.

Trump may end up looking like an idiot for pushing HCQ if it's not effective, but the media and those science journals will have been helping kill people if it is.

The preprint is very interesting, however that preprint is different from the study here.


Dr. Harvey Risch of Yale even said a month ago that it should be given and it's dangers greatly exaggerated.


 
Last edited:
Ouch......

 
Dominic Mastranglelo better?

How about the Dr John Ioannidis himself.

 
Sorry, I can't agree it wasn't a snipe against Trump. I agree HCQ may provide no benefit, but when the Lancet sides against Trump and then publishes that piece of crap study that has not only been ridiculed for horrible data and then has to be retracted along with the New England medical journal, it's political. One of the original authors of the study even "resigned" from his job after it was brought to light. Don't forget how the media quickly reported that HCQ and Trump was killing people spread like wildfire.

Trump may end up looking like an idiot for pushing HCQ if it's not effective, but the media and those science journals will have been helping kill people if it is.

The preprint is very interesting, however that preprint is different from the study here.


Dr. Harvey Risch of Yale even said a month ago that it should be given and it's dangers greatly exaggerated.


Trump is and will continue to look like an idiot regardless of whether HCQ is effective or not. Magas still clinging to this phony conspiracy theory bs about it being a ploy against trump is truly laughable.
 
Trump is and will continue to look like an idiot regardless of whether HCQ is effective or not. Magas still clinging to this phony conspiracy theory bs about it being a ploy against trump is truly laughable.

I guess I remember the fish tank cleaner incident differently.
 
Sorry, I can't agree it wasn't a snipe against Trump. I agree HCQ may provide no benefit, but when the Lancet sides against Trump and then publishes that piece of crap study that has not only been ridiculed for horrible data and then has to be retracted along with the New England medical journal, it's political. One of the original authors of the study even "resigned" from his job after it was brought to light. Don't forget how the media quickly reported that HCQ and Trump was killing people spread like wildfire.

Trump may end up looking like an idiot for pushing HCQ if it's not effective, but the media and those science journals will have been helping kill people if it is.

The preprint is very interesting, however that preprint is different from the study here.


Dr. Harvey Risch of Yale even said a month ago that it should be given and it's dangers greatly exaggerated.



Ok and as a pharmacist I’d have to disagree on a global conspiracy theory to undermine trump and kill millions of people by not recommending Hydroxychloroquine. It may have use on the most critical, but they usually throw the kitchen sink at those patients...that’s not the way it was touted. Again, risk benefit.
 
Ok and as a pharmacist I’d have to disagree on a global conspiracy theory to undermine trump and kill millions of people by not recommending Hydroxychloroquine. It may have use on the most critical, but they usually throw the kitchen sink at those patients...that’s not the way it was touted. Again, risk benefit.

No, I don't think it's global. Just amoung the press in this nation and the scientific journals who should have never waded into the political aspect.
 
Trump is and will continue to look like an idiot regardless of whether HCQ is effective or not. Magas still clinging to this phony conspiracy theory bs about it being a ploy against trump is truly laughable.

Then care to explain the Lancet publishing a bad study and then having to retract it along with the media who pushed Trump is killing people?
 
Ouch......



Wait, What?? It's airborne?? This has been known since March. Great journalism NYT. SMH

Perhaps these 239 experts can conduct a study to confirm a round wheel is indeed better than a square wheel.

 
Stanford Doc: COVID Fatality Rate For People Under 45 Is "Almost 0%"
Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
by Tyler Durden
Sun, 07/05/2020 - 09:20
TwitterFacebookRedditEmailPrint

Authored by Dominick Mastrangelo via The Washington Examiner,

this article goes with the increasing drumbeat that Corono is loosing its punch. While becoming even easier to spread,
Tyler Durden, extremely reliable source you got there...

Then care to explain the Lancet publishing a bad study and then having to retract it along with the media who pushed Trump is killing people?
Encouraging people to basically consume fish tank cleaner exposes you to attacks like that. Maybe if Trump wasn’t such an idio... oh never mind ?
 
Tyler Durden, extremely reliable source you got there...


Encouraging people to basically consume fish tank cleaner exposes you to attacks like that. Maybe if Trump wasn’t such an idio... oh never mind ?

On the first part, I posted the actually transcript from the Dr in question above.

On the second, so Trump being an idiot allows people who don't like his politics to vilify a possible helpful drug?

BTW another preprint study in NY showed reduced mortality rates in those given HCQ, FWIW.
 
On the first part, I posted the actually transcript from the Dr in question above.

On the second, so Trump being an idiot allows people who don't like his politics to vilify a possible helpful drug?
It wasn’t verified to helpful and encouraging people to take an unproven drug.. is just wrong and idiotic in so many ways
 
It wasn’t verified to helpful and encouraging people to take an unproven drug.. is just wrong and idiotic in so many ways

And that is completely understandable, had Trump's drug killed people he should have been ridiculed. However instead of letting Trump fall on his own, the press vilified the drug, science journals made political statements against Trump and then published a study that helped stop clinical trials around the world. The study was quickly torn apart because of bad and made up data, had to be retracted, and clinical trials around the world restarted.
 
Pretty horrible snide, you can certainly do better than that.
I couldn't resist..... especially after that facetious post, from you, about everything being a liberal hoax. Furthermore it was not a horrible snide. It was in jest. Surely, you can differentiate between the two.
 
It was a "liberal" hoax" as Trump called it back in March.

View attachment 43748

I’m no Trump fan, whatsoever, but this error keeps getting recirculated. The liberal hoax he was referring to was actually not the virus, itself. Rather, he was referring to the Dem criticism of his response to it:

From Snopes:

“In context, Trump did not say in the passage above that the virus itself was a hoax. He instead said that Democrats’ criticism of his administration’s response to it was a hoax.”

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top